Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajith Kumar.B vs Union of India (Uoi)

Ajith Kumar.B vs Union of India (Uoi)

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 30, 2023
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1370651

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/18352/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajith Kumar.B

Respondent

Union of India (Uoi)

Excerpt

.....to file appropriate application seeking enhanced pension in terms of the w.p(c) no.18352 of 2020 -: 2 :- amended scheme and the directions of the supreme court. if such an application is submitted, the same shall be considered by the appropriate authority of the organization without delay. sathish ninan, judge svp appendix of wp(c) 18352/2020 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the judgment dated 4.11.2011 in w.p.(c).no.6643/2007 exhibit p2 true copy of the judgment dated 31.03.2016 in slp no.7074/2014. exhibit p3 true copy of the proceedings dated 20.02.2007 issued by the regional provident fund commissioner, thiruvananthapuram. exhibit p4 true copy of the gsr 609 (e) dated 22.08.2014. exhibit p5 true copy of the judgment in w.p.(c) no.26423 of 2016 filed by the employees of the 9th respondent. exhibit p6 true copy of the order dated 01.04.2019 in slp no.9610/2019. exhibit p7 true copy of the demand notice issued by the 3rd respondent.exhibit p8 true copy of the pension payment orderissued in respect of the 4th petitioner by the 2nd respondent dated 05.02.2020.exhibit p9 true copy of the pension payment orderissued in respect of the 7th petitioner by the 2nd respondent dated 20.03.2019.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN SATURDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 8TH ASWINA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 18352 OF 2020 PETITIONERS:

1 AJITH KUMAR.B SOUPARNIKA, CKRA 25A, MANNANTHALA, NALANCHIRA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PF A/C.NO.KR/TVM/0004602/000/0000130 P.P.NO.KR/TVM/00087589 2 MOHANAN NAIR.D. LEKSHMI NIVAS, KRA 55, KARIPPOOR, MOOZHINADA, MANCHADI ROAD, MALAYINKIZH P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/0004602/000/0000091, P.P.O.NO.KR/TVM/00066577 3 PRABHAKARAN K.K. ALAKKANDY HOUSE, KARIMKUTTY, KOTTATHARA P.O., WAYANAD, PF.A/C.NO.KR/KKD/0011988/000/000042, P.P.NO.KR/KKD/00070370 4 CHACKO Y. V.V.BHAVANAM, KANNAMANGALAM NORTH, CHETTIKULANGARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PF.A/C NO.KR/KTM/0003808/000/0000520, P.P.O.NO.KR/KTM/00044088 5 SATHEESAN E.R. EDASSERY HOUSE, MANNAMPETTA, VARAKKARA P.O., AMBALLUR, THRISSUR, PF A/C NO.KR/KCH/001345/000/0000015, P.P.NO.KR/KCH/00115813 6 SIVAN PILLAI RESHMA VIALSAM, PUNUKANNOOR, PERUMPUZHA P.O., KUNDARA, KOLLAM, PF A/C NO.KR/KLM/0004466/000/0000083 P.P.O.NO.KR/KLM/00105206 7 MOHANAN ACHARY PUTHENPARAMBIL, PALIAKKARA, THIRUVALLA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA, PF A/C.NO.KR/KKD/0004509/000/0000289 P.P.P.NO.KR/TVM/00085115

WPC No.18352 of 2020 -: 2 :-

8 DANIEL A. PALAVILA PADINJATTATHIL, KUNNIKODU, VILAKUDY, KOLLAM, PF. A/C. NO.KR/KLM/0004466/000/0000193 P.P.O.NO.KR/KLM/00109032 9 SOMAN S. ANJILIVILAYIL, VALLIKUNNAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PF A/C NO.KR/KLMM/0004446/000/0000229, P.P.O.NO.KR/KLM/00109032 10 RAJAN C. S/O.PIRUNGAN, CHAKKODIYIL HOUSE, PERIGOLAM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673

571. PF A/C.NO.KR/KLMM/0004446/000/00004509

11 JAYATHILAKAN E.K. S/O.CHOYI, EANGAKANDIYIN HOUSE, PILASSERY P.O., VIA KUNNAMANGALAM KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, 673571. P.P.O.NO.KR/KKD/00059435 BY ADVS. P.N.MOHANAN SRI.C.P.SABARI RESPONDENTS:

1 UNION OF INDIA (UOI) REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI- 110 001. 2 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO) BHAVISHANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 004 3 ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KOLLAM 691001. 4 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, ADITYA SABARI TOWER, POST OFFICE ROAD, THIRUNNAKKARA, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.

WPC No.18352 of 2020 -: 3 :-

5 ASSISANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KALOOR, ERNAKULAM - 682 017 6 ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ERANJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE- 673 006 7 EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEE REP. BY MANAGING TRUSTEE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, WAZIPUR, NEW DELHI- 110052 8 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-1 (PENSION), BHAVISHYA NITHI BHAVAN, 14-BHIKAJI NITHI CAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI-110066 9 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT BOARD, GOKULAM PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN -695 001 BY ADVS. NITA N.S SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Sathish Ninan, J.

============================== W.P(C) No.18352 of 2020 ========================== Dated this the 30th day of September, 2023

JUDGMENT

The claim of the petitioners is for higher pension in terms of the Employees’ Provident Scheme - 2014 amendment. The validity of the amended Employees’ Provident Scheme was upheld by the Apex Court in Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation and Another v. Sunil Kumar.B. [2022(7)KHC 12].

2. The learned Standing counsel for the

respondents points out that, in the light of the Supreme Court judgment, it is open for the petitioners to make a fresh application in terms of the amended scheme claiming higher pension, which could be considered in accordance with the scheme and the directions in the

judgment.

Resultantly, the writ petition is disposed of, permitting the writ petitioners to file appropriate application seeking enhanced pension in terms of the W.P(C) No.18352 of 2020 -: 2 :- amended scheme and the directions of the Supreme Court. If such an application is submitted, the same shall be considered by the appropriate authority of the Organization without delay. Sathish Ninan, Judge SVP APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18352/2020 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4.11.2011 IN W.P.(C).NO.6643/2007 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.03.2016 IN SLP NO.7074/2014. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 20.02.2007 ISSUED BY THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE GSR 609 (E) DATED 22.08.2014. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.26423 OF 2016 FILED BY THE EMPLOYEES OF THE 9TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 01.04.2019 IN SLP NO.9610/2019. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PENSION PAYMENT ORDER

ISSUED IN RESPECT OF THE 4TH PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 05.02.2020.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE PENSION PAYMENT ORDER

ISSUED IN RESPECT OF THE 7TH PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20.03.2019.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial