Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN SATURDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 8TH ASWINA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 18352 OF 2020 PETITIONERS:
1 AJITH KUMAR.B SOUPARNIKA, CKRA 25A, MANNANTHALA, NALANCHIRA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PF A/C.NO.KR/TVM/0004602/000/0000130 P.P.NO.KR/TVM/00087589 2 MOHANAN NAIR.D. LEKSHMI NIVAS, KRA 55, KARIPPOOR, MOOZHINADA, MANCHADI ROAD, MALAYINKIZH P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PF A/C NO.KR/TVM/0004602/000/0000091, P.P.O.NO.KR/TVM/00066577 3 PRABHAKARAN K.K. ALAKKANDY HOUSE, KARIMKUTTY, KOTTATHARA P.O., WAYANAD, PF.A/C.NO.KR/KKD/0011988/000/000042, P.P.NO.KR/KKD/00070370 4 CHACKO Y. V.V.BHAVANAM, KANNAMANGALAM NORTH, CHETTIKULANGARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PF.A/C NO.KR/KTM/0003808/000/0000520, P.P.O.NO.KR/KTM/00044088 5 SATHEESAN E.R. EDASSERY HOUSE, MANNAMPETTA, VARAKKARA P.O., AMBALLUR, THRISSUR, PF A/C NO.KR/KCH/001345/000/0000015, P.P.NO.KR/KCH/00115813 6 SIVAN PILLAI RESHMA VIALSAM, PUNUKANNOOR, PERUMPUZHA P.O., KUNDARA, KOLLAM, PF A/C NO.KR/KLM/0004466/000/0000083 P.P.O.NO.KR/KLM/00105206 7 MOHANAN ACHARY PUTHENPARAMBIL, PALIAKKARA, THIRUVALLA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA, PF A/C.NO.KR/KKD/0004509/000/0000289 P.P.P.NO.KR/TVM/00085115
WPC No.18352 of 2020 -: 2 :-
8 DANIEL A. PALAVILA PADINJATTATHIL, KUNNIKODU, VILAKUDY, KOLLAM, PF. A/C. NO.KR/KLM/0004466/000/0000193 P.P.O.NO.KR/KLM/00109032 9 SOMAN S. ANJILIVILAYIL, VALLIKUNNAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PF A/C NO.KR/KLMM/0004446/000/0000229, P.P.O.NO.KR/KLM/00109032 10 RAJAN C. S/O.PIRUNGAN, CHAKKODIYIL HOUSE, PERIGOLAM, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673
571. PF A/C.NO.KR/KLMM/0004446/000/00004509
11 JAYATHILAKAN E.K. S/O.CHOYI, EANGAKANDIYIN HOUSE, PILASSERY P.O., VIA KUNNAMANGALAM KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, 673571. P.P.O.NO.KR/KKD/00059435 BY ADVS. P.N.MOHANAN SRI.C.P.SABARI RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA (UOI) REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI- 110 001. 2 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO) BHAVISHANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 004 3 ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KOLLAM 691001. 4 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, ADITYA SABARI TOWER, POST OFFICE ROAD, THIRUNNAKKARA, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.
WPC No.18352 of 2020 -: 3 :-
5 ASSISANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KALOOR, ERNAKULAM - 682 017 6 ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ERANJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE- 673 006 7 EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEE REP. BY MANAGING TRUSTEE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, WAZIPUR, NEW DELHI- 110052 8 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-1 (PENSION), BHAVISHYA NITHI BHAVAN, 14-BHIKAJI NITHI CAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI-110066 9 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT BOARD, GOKULAM PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN -695 001 BY ADVS. NITA N.S SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Sathish Ninan, J.
============================== W.P(C) No.18352 of 2020 ========================== Dated this the 30th day of September, 2023
JUDGMENT
The claim of the petitioners is for higher pension in terms of the Employees’ Provident Scheme - 2014 amendment. The validity of the amended Employees’ Provident Scheme was upheld by the Apex Court in Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation and Another v. Sunil Kumar.B. [2022(7)KHC 12].
2. The learned Standing counsel for the
respondents points out that, in the light of the Supreme Court judgment, it is open for the petitioners to make a fresh application in terms of the amended scheme claiming higher pension, which could be considered in accordance with the scheme and the directions in the
judgment.
Resultantly, the writ petition is disposed of, permitting the writ petitioners to file appropriate application seeking enhanced pension in terms of the W.P(C) No.18352 of 2020 -: 2 :- amended scheme and the directions of the Supreme Court. If such an application is submitted, the same shall be considered by the appropriate authority of the Organization without delay. Sathish Ninan, Judge SVP APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18352/2020 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4.11.2011 IN W.P.(C).NO.6643/2007 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.03.2016 IN SLP NO.7074/2014. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 20.02.2007 ISSUED BY THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE GSR 609 (E) DATED 22.08.2014. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.26423 OF 2016 FILED BY THE EMPLOYEES OF THE 9TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 01.04.2019 IN SLP NO.9610/2019. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PENSION PAYMENT ORDER
ISSUED IN RESPECT OF THE 4TH PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 05.02.2020.
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE PENSION PAYMENT ORDER
ISSUED IN RESPECT OF THE 7TH PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20.03.2019.