Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arun V. vs State of Kerala

ARUN V. vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 19, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1369988

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./6536/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ARUN V.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen tuesday, the 19th day of september 2023 / 28th bhadra, 1945 bail appl. no. 6536 of 2021 in crime no.348/2021 of cheemeni police station, kasaragod districtpetitioners/accused nos.1 and 2: 1 arun v. s/o late govindan.v.v, aged 32 years, 2 sarojini, w/o late govindan.v.v, aged 63 years, by advs. t.madhu c.r.saradamani shahid azeez renjish s menon respondents/state: 1 state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682031. 2 the station house officer cheemeni police station, kasaragod district-671313. sr pp - k denny devassy this bail application having come up for admission on 19.09.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: b.a.no. 6536 of 2021orderdated this the 19th day of september, 2023 this is an application for anticipatory bail filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, by accused nos. 1 and 2 in crime no.348/2021 of cheemeni police station, kasaragod where the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under sections 498a and 324 read with 34 of ipc.2. the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as thethe learned public prosecutor would submit that, entire proceedings in crime no.348/2021 of cheemeni police station, kasaragod has been quashed by this court as per order in crl.m.c. no.5171/2021 dated 02.12.2021. therefore, the bail application has become infructuous. recording the submission, the bail application stands dismissed as infructuous. sd/- a. badharudeen sk judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 28TH BHADRA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 6536 OF 2021 IN CRIME NO.348/2021 OF CHEEMENI POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2: 1 ARUN V. S/O LATE GOVINDAN.V.V, AGED 32 YEARS, 2 SAROJINI, W/O LATE GOVINDAN.V.V, AGED 63 YEARS, BY ADVS. T.MADHU C.R.SARADAMANI SHAHID AZEEZ RENJISH S MENON RESPONDENTS/STATE: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER CHEEMENI POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT-671313. SR PP - K DENNY DEVASSY THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No. 6536 of 2021

ORDER

Dated this the 19th day of September, 2023 This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No.348/2021 of Cheemeni Police Station, Kasaragod where the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A and 324 read with 34 of IPC.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the

the learned Public Prosecutor would submit that, entire proceedings in Crime No.348/2021 of Cheemeni Police Station, Kasaragod has been quashed by this Court as per order in Crl.M.C. No.5171/2021 dated 02.12.2021. Therefore, the bail application has become infructuous. Recording the submission, the bail application stands dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN SK JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial