Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gireesan.S vs the Managing Director, Kerala State Audio Visual Reprographical Centre

Gireesan.S vs The Managing Director, Kerala State Audio Visual Reprographical Centre

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 24, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1369903

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WA/309/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gireesan.S

Respondent

The Managing Director, Kerala State Audio Visual Reprographical Centre

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice s.v.bhatti & the honourable mr.justice basant balaji friday, the 24th day of february 2023 / 5th phalguna, 1944 wa no. 309 of 2016 against the judgmentwpc 32755/2011 of high court of keralaappellant/s: gireesan.s, pansnilkunne veedu, kochiravila, manacaude p.o., thiruvananthapuram -695 009. by adv sri.poovappally m.ramachandran nair; adv antony joseph respondent/s: 1 the managing director, kerala state audio visual reprographical centre, c-capt, centre for advance printing technology, vattiyoorkavu, thiruvananthapuram - 695 013. 2 state of kerala, represented by its secretary to government, department of education, thiruvananthapuram -695 001. by adv smt.latha anand, sc, c-apt this writ appeal having come up for admission on 24.02.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.a. no.309/2016 -2-judgments.v. bhatti, j.mr antony joseph, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, referring to the instructions received, seeks liberty of the court to withdraw the writ appeal. writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. s.v.bhatti basant balaji jjj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1944 WA NO. 309 OF 2016 AGAINST THE JUDGMENTWPC 32755/2011 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

APPELLANT/S: GIREESAN.S, PANSNILKUNNE VEEDU, KOCHIRAVILA, MANACAUDE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 009. BY ADV SRI.POOVAPPALLY M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR; ADV ANTONY JOSEPH RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE AUDIO VISUAL REPROGRAPHICAL CENTRE, C-CAPT, CENTRE FOR ADVANCE PRINTING TECHNOLOGY, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 013. 2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001. BY ADV SMT.LATHA ANAND, SC, C-APT THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A. No.309/2016 -2-

JUDGMENT

S.V. Bhatti, J.

Mr Antony Joseph, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, referring to the instructions received, seeks liberty of the Court to withdraw the Writ Appeal. Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. S.V.BHATTI BASANT BALAJI jjj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial