K C Stanly vs Sugathakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 01, 2023

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1368840

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1368840
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman
Decided On: Aug 01, 2023
Case Number: Con.Case(C)/1353/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K C Stanly

Respondent

Sugathakumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman tuesday, the 1st day of august 2023 / 10th sravana, 1945 con.case(c) no. 1353 of 2023 against the order/judgment in wp(c) 35251/2022 of high court of kerala petitioner: k c stanly aged 64 years, s/o.chakkappan kadicheeni house, near bed college, neythakudy, pin-680 732, thrissur district, now residing at flat no.103, 2nd block, damden solarium apartment, ring road, hebbal, mysuru, karnataka state, pin - 570017 by adv t.k.ajithkumar (valath) respondent: sugathakumar the secretary, thripunithura municipality, thripunithura municipality office, thripunithura, pin - 682301 by advs. k.s.arun kumar, sc, tripunithura municipality this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 01.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: con.case(c) no. 1353 of 2023 2judgmentdated this the 1st day of august, 2023 this contempt of court case is filed alleging non compliance with annexure 1, judgment dated 09-02-2023. the directions contained in the judgment was for consideration of the application submitted by the petitioner for building permit and to pass orders on the same.2. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondentthat the application had been considered and ext.r1(a) communication had been issued to the petitioner. in case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the same, the rejection will have to be challenged in accordance with law. leaving open all the contentions of the petitioner and his right to move challenging ext.r1(a) communication, this contempt of court case is closed. sd/- anu sivaraman judge ska con.case(c) no. 1353 of 2023 3 appendix of con.case(c) 1353/2023 annexure 1 the certified copy of the judgment in wp(c)no.35251/2022 dated 9-2-2023 respondent annexures annexure-r1(a) a true copy of the letter dated 24-3-3023 from this respondent to the petitioner annexure 2 the copy of the receipt dated 27-2-2023 issued from the office of the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 10TH SRAVANA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1353 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35251/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: K C STANLY AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.CHAKKAPPAN KADICHEENI HOUSE, NEAR BED COLLEGE, NEYTHAKUDY, PIN-680 732, THRISSUR DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT FLAT NO.103, 2ND BLOCK, DAMDEN SOLARIUM APARTMENT, RING ROAD, HEBBAL, MYSURU, KARNATAKA STATE, PIN - 570017 BY ADV T.K.AJITHKUMAR (VALATH) RESPONDENT: SUGATHAKUMAR THE SECRETARY, THRIPUNITHURA MUNICIPALITY, THRIPUNITHURA MUNICIPALITY OFFICE, THRIPUNITHURA, PIN - 682301 BY ADVS. K.S.ARUN KUMAR, SC, TRIPUNITHURA MUNICIPALITY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CON.CASE(C) NO. 1353 OF 2023 2

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of August, 2023 This Contempt of Court Case is filed alleging non compliance with Annexure 1, judgment dated 09-02-2023. The directions contained in the judgment was for consideration of the application submitted by the petitioner for building permit and to pass orders on the same.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent

that the application had been considered and Ext.R1(A) communication had been issued to the petitioner. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the same, the rejection will have to be challenged in accordance with law. Leaving open all the contentions of the petitioner and his right to move challenging Ext.R1(A) communication, this Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE ska CON.CASE(C) NO. 1353 OF 2023 3 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1353/2023 Annexure 1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.35251/2022 DATED 9-2-2023 RESPONDENT ANNEXURES ANNEXURE-R1(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 24-3-3023 FROM THIS RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Annexure 2 THE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 27-2-2023 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties K C Stanly vs Sugathakumar Same Judge Honourable Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman