Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sinto vs State of Kerala

SINTO vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 21, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1368181

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./4865/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SINTO

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice mohammed nias c.p. thursday, the 21st day of september 2023 / 30th bhadra, 1945 bail appl. no. 4865 of 2023 against the order/judgment in cmp 565/2023 of additional district court, thrissur (crime no.50/2022 of thrissur excise range, thrissur) petitioner/3rd accused: sinto aged 29 years, s/o antony, perumayan house, ollukkara village, vettikkal desom, thrissur taluk, pin - 680651by adv vishnu bhuvanendran respondent/state: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin - 682031 by smt.nima jacob, pp this bail application having come up for admission on 21.09.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..mohammed nias c.p., j.--------------------- b.a.no. 4865/2023 --------------------------- dated this the 21st day of september, 2023orderthis application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, seeking pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioner is the 3rd accused in crime no.50/2022 of thrissur excise range, thrissur, for having allegedly committed offences punishable under sections 22(c) and 29 of the ndps act.3. the allegation of the prosecution is that, on 13.12.2022 ataround 11.20 p.m, the excise officials recovered 116 g.m of mdma at nellikunnu from the possession of accused nos. 1 & 2 and thereafter, based on the confession statement of the 1st accused, the petitioner and others were made as accused persons.4. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor were heard.5. considering that the allegations are made under theprovisions of the ndps act and that 17 other cases are registered against ..3.. the petitioner, i do not think this as a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. hence, this application is dismissed. sd/- mohammed nias c.p. judge apa

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 30TH BHADRA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 4865 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 565/2023 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR (CRIME NO.50/2022 OF THRISSUR EXCISE RANGE, THRISSUR) PETITIONER/3rd ACCUSED: SINTO AGED 29 YEARS, S/O ANTONY, PERUMAYAN HOUSE, OLLUKKARA VILLAGE, VETTIKKAL DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK, PIN - 680651

BY ADV VISHNU BHUVANENDRAN RESPONDENT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY SMT.NIMA JACOB, PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J.

--------------------- B.A.No. 4865/2023 --------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of September, 2023

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.50/2022 of Thrissur Excise Range, Thrissur, for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Sections 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act.

3. The allegation of the prosecution is that, on 13.12.2022 at

around 11.20 p.m, the excise officials recovered 116 g.m of MDMA at Nellikunnu from the possession of accused Nos. 1 & 2 and thereafter, based on the confession statement of the 1st accused, the petitioner and others were made as accused persons.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor were heard.

5. Considering that the allegations are made under the

provisions of the NDPS Act and that 17 other cases are registered against ..3.. the petitioner, I do not think this as a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Hence, this application is dismissed. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE APA

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial