Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1945 RSA NO. 22 OF 2017 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.12.2004 IN AS 33/2001 OF I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, TRIVANDRUM (ARISING OUT OF JUDGMENT DATED 14.02.2001 IN OS 1450/1997 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF'S COURT (RENT CONTROL COURT), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM). APPELLANT/RESPONDENT IN A.S./PLAINTIFF IN THE SUIT: K. THANKAPPAN, S/O.LATE MR.KESAVAN, AGED 73 YEARS, T.C.36/1850, KAMALA BHAVAN, SRI.L.MOHANAN SMT.LIGEY ANTONY RESPONDENTS/2ND APPELLANT IN APPEAL & LR'S OF DECEASED 1ST APPELLANT/2ND DEFENDANT IN THE SUIT AND CLAIM PETITIONER IN EA 358/2014:
1 CHANDRAN, S/O.THE LATE MR.MADHAVAN, PANAYIL VEEDU, KAITHAVILAKOM, PERUMTHANNI WARD, 2 SMT.SOBHA W/O.CHANDRAN, RESIDING AT -DO-. 3 SMT.LALITHA, W/O.SOMAN, RESIDING NEAR OOKKODE SCHOOL, KALLIYOOR VILLAGE, KALLIYOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695042. 4 SMT.PADMINI, W/O.RAVEENDRANATH, SHEEJA BHAVAN, JAYAPRAKASH LANE, KUDAPPANAKUNNU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695043. 5 M.VIKRAMAN, S/O.THE LATE MR.MADHAVAN, VISAKOM VEEDU, TC36/1849, SUBHASH NAGAR, 6 M.RAJENDRAN, S/O.THE LATE MR.MADHAVAN, PANAYIL VEEDU, TC36/1849,
7 SMT.SUKUMARI, W/O.C.SUGATHAN, VELIKKAKATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, KOCHUTHURA, KARUMKULAM VILLAGE, PULLUVILA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695526. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)-R1 AND R2 SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN- R1 AND R2 SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN- R1 AND R2 SRI.S.NITHIN ANCHAL- R1 AND R2 SRI.SABU GEORGE- R1 AND R2 SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN- R1 AND R2 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of April, 2023. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.33/2001 on the file of I Additional Subordinate court, Thiruvananthapuram, which in turn arose out of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.1450/1997 on the file of Additional Munsiff’s court (RCC), Thiruvananthapuram. Not press memo has been filed and it is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the sole appellant is no more. Legal representatives of the deceased appellant do not want to prosecute the appeal further. Hence, appeal dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- rps/ M.R.ANITHA, JUDGE