Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mercy vs S. Jayasankar

MERCY vs S. Jayasankar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 19, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1367267

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/1269/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MERCY

Respondent

S. Jayasankar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan wednesday, the 19th day of july 2023 / 28th ashadha, 1945 con.case(c) no. 1269 of 2023 against the order/judgment in wp(c) 16029/2023 of high court of kerala petitioner/petitioner in the writ petition:mercy aged 55 years w/o p.l.johnson, pallisseery house, thekkumoolakkara desom, parappukkara.p.o., parappukkara village, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district, pin - 680310, represented by her power of attorney holder : johnson, aged 65 years, s/o lonappan, pallisseery house, thekkumoolakkara desom, parappukkara.p.o., parappukkara village, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district, pin - 680310. by adv. rajesh chakyatrespondent/1st respondents against whom the contempt is alleged: s. jayasankar, age and father's name not known to the petitioner, the divisional forest officer, thrissur division, ayyanthole, thrissur district, pin - 680003 by adv. smt.vidya kuriakose, gp this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 19.07.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------- dated this the 19th day of july, 2023judgmentwhen this contempt case came up for consideration, the counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the directions in thejudgment dated 23.05.2023 in w.p.(c)no.16029/2023 have already been complied with. in the light of the above submission, this contempt case (c) is closed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan judge dm appendix of con.case(c) 1269/2023 petitioner annexuresannexure 1 certified copy of the judgmentdated 23.05.2023 in w.p. (c).no.16029/2023. annexure 2 a true copy of the application dated 02.06.2023 by the petitioner and its receipt. respondents exhibits : nil //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1269 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 16029/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:

MERCY AGED 55 YEARS W/O P.L.JOHNSON, PALLISSEERY HOUSE, THEKKUMOOLAKKARA DESOM, PARAPPUKKARA.P.O., PARAPPUKKARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680310, REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER : JOHNSON, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O LONAPPAN, PALLISSEERY HOUSE, THEKKUMOOLAKKARA DESOM, PARAPPUKKARA.P.O., PARAPPUKKARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680310. BY ADV. RAJESH CHAKYAT

RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENTS AGAINST WHOM THE CONTEMPT IS ALLEGED: S. JAYASANKAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, THRISSUR DIVISION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680003 BY ADV. SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of July, 2023

JUDGMENT

When this Contempt Case came up for consideration, the counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the directions in the

judgment dated 23.05.2023 in W.P.

(C)No.16029/2023 have already been complied with. In the light of the above submission, this Contempt Case (C) is closed. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE DM APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1269/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

DATED 23.05.2023 IN W.P. (C).NO.16029/2023. ANNEXURE 2 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 02.06.2023 BY THE PETITIONER AND ITS RECEIPT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial