Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vasudevan Manoj vs Praseeda

Vasudevan Manoj vs Praseeda

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 22, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1367196

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/36/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vasudevan Manoj

Respondent

Praseeda

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias friday, the 22nd day of december 2023 / 1st pousha, 1945 against the order in mc 101/2014 of family court, alappuzha revision petitioner/respondent: vasudevan manoj m.p.vasudevan nair, ananda mandiram, chekkidikkadu po, pacha, edathua, alappuzha district, pin 689573 sri.m.p.madhavankutty sri.gokul das v.v.h. smt.smitha pillai respondent/petitioner: praseeda d/o.late p.e.balakrishna kurup, pradeep bhavan, pollethai po, mararikulam, alappuzha, pin 688549 sri.k.a.anish sri.eldo kuriakose sri.k.habeebulla sri.k.paul kuriakose sri.t.a.rafeek cherthala this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 22.12.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthe revision petition is filed assailing the order in mc no.101/2014 of the family court, alappuzha, directing the revision petitioner to pay the respondent monthly maintenance allowance @ rs.2,500/- from the date of application (13.8.2014). the revision petitioner was the respondent and the respondent was the petitioner before the family court.2. heard; sri.m.p.madhavankutty, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and sri.paul kuriakose, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.3. the learned counsel appearing on both sides submitted that the subject matter in dispute betweenthe revision petitioner and the respondent has been harmoniously settled and they have resumed cohabitation. therefore, the revision petitioner is nolonger desirous of prosecuting this revision petition. hence, the revision petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. the said submission is recorded. resultantly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ma/22.12.2023 sd/-c.s.dias, judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 1ST POUSHA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 101/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, ALAPPUZHA REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: VASUDEVAN MANOJ M.P.VASUDEVAN NAIR, ANANDA MANDIRAM, CHEKKIDIKKADU PO, PACHA, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN 689573 SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY SRI.GOKUL DAS V.V.H. SMT.SMITHA PILLAI RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: PRASEEDA D/O.LATE P.E.BALAKRISHNA KURUP, PRADEEP BHAVAN, POLLETHAI PO, MARARIKULAM, ALAPPUZHA, PIN 688549 SRI.K.A.ANISH SRI.ELDO KURIAKOSE SRI.K.HABEEBULLA SRI.K.PAUL KURIAKOSE SRI.T.A.RAFEEK CHERTHALA THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The revision petition is filed assailing the order in MC No.101/2014 of the Family Court, Alappuzha, directing the revision petitioner to pay the respondent monthly maintenance allowance @ Rs.2,500/- from the date of application (13.8.2014). The revision petitioner was the respondent and the respondent was the petitioner before the Family Court.

2. Heard; Sri.M.P.Madhavankutty, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and Sri.Paul Kuriakose, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

3. The learned counsel appearing on both sides submitted that the subject matter in dispute between

the revision petitioner and the respondent       has been
harmoniously      settled   and    they   have   resumed
cohabitation.   Therefore, the revision petitioner is no

longer desirous of prosecuting this revision petition. Hence, the revision petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. The said submission is recorded. Resultantly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ma/22.12.2023 Sd/-C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial