Jayan vs Sobika

JAYAN vs Sobika

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 30, 2023

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1367089

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1367089
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias
Decided On: Nov 30, 2023
Case Number: RPFC/119/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

JAYAN

Respondent

Sobika

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias thursday, the 30th day of november 2023 / 9th agrahayana, 1945 rpfc no. 119 of 2016 against the order in mc 26/2015 of family court, nedumangad dated 17.12.2015revision petitioner/respondent in mc: jayan aged 39 years s/o.sadanandan, swathy nilayam, mandapamvilla, anad, anadu village, nedaumangadu thiruvananthapuram distict, pin: 695 541. by advs. sri.j.r.prem navaz sri.p.t.sheejish respondent/petitioner in mc: sobika s/o.sobhana, sobhika vilasom, valiya venkodu, memala p.o., vithura, nedumangadu, thiruvananthapuram 695 541. by adv sri.a.s.shammy raj this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 30.11.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:c. s. dias, j.dated this the 30th day of november, 2023orderthe revision petition is filed questioning the legality and the correctness of the order in m.c. no.26/2015 of the family court, nedumangad, ordering the revision petitioner to pay the respondent monthly maintenance at the rate of rs.5,000/- from the date of petition (23.01.2015). the revision petitioner was the respondent and the respondent was the petitioner before the family court.2. today when the revision petition wastaken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on both sides submitted that the subject matter in dispute between the parties has been settled as per the memorandum of mediation settlement agreement executed between the them before the family court. therefore, the revision petitioner is no longer desirous of prosecuting this revision petition. the revision petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. the said submission is recorded resultantly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- c. s. dias judge skp/30-11

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 RPFC NO. 119 OF 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 26/2015 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD DATED 17.12.2015
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN MC: JAYAN AGED 39 YEARS S/O.SADANANDAN, SWATHY NILAYAM, MANDAPAMVILLA, ANAD, ANADU VILLAGE, NEDAUMANGADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTICT, PIN: 695 541. BY ADVS. SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN MC: SOBIKA S/O.SOBHANA, SOBHIKA VILASOM, VALIYA VENKODU, MEMALA P.O., VITHURA, NEDUMANGADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 541. BY ADV SRI.A.S.SHAMMY RAJ THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C. S. DIAS, J.
Dated this the 30th day of November, 2023

ORDER

The revision petition is filed questioning the legality and the correctness of the order in M.C. No.26/2015 of the Family Court, Nedumangad, ordering the revision petitioner to pay the respondent monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- from the date of petition (23.01.2015). The revision petitioner was the respondent and the respondent was the petitioner before the Family Court.

2. Today when the revision petition was

taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on both sides submitted that the subject matter in dispute between the parties has been settled as per the memorandum of mediation settlement agreement executed between the them before the Family Court. Therefore, the revision petitioner is no longer desirous of prosecuting this revision petition. The revision petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. The said submission is recorded Resultantly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- C. S. DIAS JUDGE SKP/30-11

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2023 Same Parties JAYAN vs Sobika Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias