Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lilly vs Mary

LILLY vs MARY

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 21, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1364610

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/487/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

LILLY

Respondent

MARY

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sathish ninan monday, the 21st day of august 2023 / 30th sravana, 1945 rfa no. 487 of 2014 against the judgment and decree in os 6/2012 of additional sub court, irinjalakuda appellant/1st defendant: lilly, w/o. jose & d/o. kattalapeedika ouseph @ kochappan, aged 56 years, kannampilly house, thrissur district. respondents/plaintiffs/defendants no.2 to 4:1 mary, w/o. kongoth johny & d/o. kattalapeedika ouseph @ kochappan,aged 64 years, thumboor desom, 2 elsy, d/o. kattalapeedika ouseph @ kochappan, aged 60, w/o. kongoth antu, thumboor desom, 3 shajan, s/o. kattalapeedika yohanan, aged 45, 4 rosy, d/o. kattalapeedika yohanan, aged 66, thrissur district, pin - 680 683. 5 nikson, s/o. kattalapeedika yohanan, aged 40, by advs.sri.t.n.manoj for r1 sri.mansoor ali for r3 this regular first appeal having come up for admissionon 21.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:sathish ninan, j.============================== r.f.a no.487 of 2014 ========================== dated this the 21st day of august, 2023judgmentlearned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have settled the disputes and that the appeal is not pressed. in the light of the above submission, the regular first appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- sathish ninan, judge vdv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 30TH SRAVANA, 1945 RFA NO. 487 OF 2014 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 6/2012 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT: LILLY, W/O. JOSE & D/O. KATTALAPEEDIKA OUSEPH @ KOCHAPPAN, AGED 56 YEARS, KANNAMPILLY HOUSE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS/DEFENDANTS NO.2 TO 4:

1 MARY, W/O. KONGOTH JOHNY & D/O. KATTALAPEEDIKA OUSEPH @ KOCHAPPAN,AGED 64 YEARS, THUMBOOR DESOM, 2 ELSY, D/O. KATTALAPEEDIKA OUSEPH @ KOCHAPPAN, AGED 60, W/O. KONGOTH ANTU, THUMBOOR DESOM, 3 SHAJAN, S/O. KATTALAPEEDIKA YOHANAN, AGED 45, 4 ROSY, D/O. KATTALAPEEDIKA YOHANAN, AGED 66, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 683. 5 NIKSON, S/O. KATTALAPEEDIKA YOHANAN, AGED 40, BY ADVS.SRI.T.N.MANOJ FOR R1 SRI.MANSOOR ALI FOR R3 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 21.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Sathish Ninan, J.

============================== R.F.A No.487 of 2014 ========================== Dated this the 21st day of August, 2023

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have settled the disputes and that the appeal is not pressed. In the light of the above submission, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge vdv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial