Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pachiyammal vs Marathat

Pachiyammal vs Marathat

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 22, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1364083

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/988/2010

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pachiyammal

Respondent

Marathat

Excerpt

.....kounder, aged 45 years, kulathukattil, near malayankadu, valiyavallampathy village,, chittur taluk,sri.r.harishankar - r1 to r3 sri.sajan vargheese k - r4 sri.liju. m.p - r4 smt.parvathy nair - r1 to r3 this regular second appeal having come up for orders on 22.08.2023, along with co.11/2020, the court on the same day delivered the following:in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice t.r.ravi tuesday, the 22nd day of august 2023 / 31st sravana, 1945 co no. 11 of 2020 against the judgment and decree in as 103/2006 of district court, palakkad os 243/1998 of principal sub court, palakkad cross objector/4th respondent/3rd respondent/3rd defendant: subramaniyan aged 55 years sajan vargheese k. sri.liju. m.p respondents/appellants & respondents no.1 to 3/respondents no.1 and 2 & appellants/defendants no.1 and 2 & plaintiffs: 1 pachiyammal aged 92 years malankadu, nattukal post, valiyavallampathy village, 2 sakthivel aged 64 years chittur taluk,palakkad district-678 554. 3 marathal aged 63 years,w/o. late mayilswamy kounder, kulathukattil, near malankadu, valiyavallampathy village, nattukal post, chittur taluk,palakkad district-678 554. 4 anandkumar, aged 43 years s/o. late mayilswamy kounder, kulathukattil, near 5 kuchi @ parameswari aged 41 years s/o. late mayilswamy kounder, kulathukattil, near chittur taluk,palakkad district-678 554. sri.binoy vasudevan r.harishankar sri.r.manikantan this cross objection/cross appeal having come up for admission on 22.08.2023, along with rsa.988/2010, the court on the same day delivered the following:t.r. ravi, j.-------------------------------------- [rsa no.988/2010 & cross objection no.11/2020 in rsa no.988/2010 ] ---------------------------------------------------- dated this the 22nd day of august, 2023judgmentwhen the case is taken up, the counsel for the appellants submits no instructions. the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. the cross objection is also closed in view of.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1945 RSA NO. 988 OF 2010 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 103/2006 OF DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD OS 243/1998 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 PACHIYAMMAL, W/O LATE PAZHANI KOUNDER AGED 83 YEARS, KULATHUKATTIL, NEAR MALAYANKADU,, VALIYAVALLAMPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, 2 SAKTHIVEL, S/O.LATE PAZHANI KOUNDER AGED 54 YEARS, KULATHUKATTIL, NEAR MALAYANKADU, VALIYAVALLAMPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SRI.R.MANIKANTAN RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:

1 MARATHAL, W/O. LATE MAYILSWAMY KOUNDER AGED 53 YEARS,KULATHUKATTIL, NEAR MALAYANKADU, VALIYAVALLAMPATHY VILLAGE,CHITTUR TALUK, 2 ANANDHKUMAR, S/O.LATE MAYILSWAMY KOUNDER AGED 33 YEARS,KULATHUKATTIL, NEAR MALAYANKADU, VALIYAVALLAMPATHY VILLAGE,CHITTUR TALUK, 3 KUNCHI ALIAS PARAMESWARI, D/O.LATE MAYILSWAMY KOUNDER,AGED 32 YEARS,KULATHUKATTIL, NEAR MALAYANKADU,VALIYAVALLAMPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4 SUBRAMANIAN, S/O.LATE PAZHANI KOUNDER, AGED 45 YEARS, KULATHUKATTIL, NEAR MALAYANKADU, VALIYAVALLAMPATHY VILLAGE,, CHITTUR TALUK,

SRI.R.HARISHANKAR - R1 TO R3 SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K - R4 SRI.LIJU. M.P - R4 SMT.PARVATHY NAIR - R1 TO R3 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 22.08.2023, ALONG WITH CO.11/2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1945 CO NO. 11 OF 2020 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 103/2006 OF DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD OS 243/1998 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD CROSS OBJECTOR/4TH RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT/3RD DEFENDANT: SUBRAMANIYAN AGED 55 YEARS SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS & RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3/RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 & APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS NO.1 AND 2 & PLAINTIFFS: 1 PACHIYAMMAL AGED 92 YEARS MALANKADU, NATTUKAL POST, VALIYAVALLAMPATHY VILLAGE, 2 SAKTHIVEL AGED 64 YEARS CHITTUR TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 554. 3 MARATHAL AGED 63 YEARS,W/O. LATE MAYILSWAMY KOUNDER, KULATHUKATTIL, NEAR MALANKADU, VALIYAVALLAMPATHY VILLAGE, NATTUKAL POST, CHITTUR TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 554. 4 ANANDKUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS S/O. LATE MAYILSWAMY KOUNDER, KULATHUKATTIL, NEAR 5 KUCHI @ PARAMESWARI AGED 41 YEARS S/O. LATE MAYILSWAMY KOUNDER, KULATHUKATTIL, NEAR CHITTUR TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 554. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN R.HARISHANKAR SRI.R.MANIKANTAN THIS CROSS OBJECTION/CROSS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.08.2023, ALONG WITH RSA.988/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

T.R. RAVI, J.

-------------------------------------- [RSA No.988/2010 & CROSS OBJECTION No.11/2020 in RSA No.988/2010 ] ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2023

JUDGMENT

When the case is taken up, the counsel for the appellants submits no instructions. The appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. The Cross Objection is also closed in view of the dismissal of the appeal. Sd/- T.R.RAVI JUDGE mpm

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial