Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ashraf vs Ilmiyath and Another

Ashraf vs Ilmiyath and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 26, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1363113

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/419/2010

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashraf

Respondent

Ilmiyath and Another

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias thursday, the 26th day of october 2023 / 4th karthika, 1945 rpfc no. 419 of 2010 against the order in mc 229/2010 of family court, malappuram revision petitioner: ashraf,s/o saithalavi, bappunvinde purakkal, sreedhar nursery road, po chettippadi, parappanangadi, malappuram district. through power holder, sister rebimol @ kunhimol. by adv sri.k.k.mohamed ravuf respondents: 1 ilmiyath, d/o abdul rahiman kutty, palakkavalappil, tanur. 2 alfa minor 2 years do. do. do. represented by mother 1st respondent.this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 26.10.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: r.p.(f.c.) no.419 of 2010 2 dated this the 26th day of october, 2023orderthe revision petition is filed challenging the orderpassed in m.c.no.229/2010 of the family court, malappuram, ordering the revision petitioner to pay maintenance to the respondents - his wife and daughter at the rate of rs.2500/- and rs.500/- per month, respectively.2. heard; sri. k.k.mohammed ravuf, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner.3. the learned counsel appearing for the revisionpetitioner submitted that subsequent to the filing of the revision petition, the subject matter in dispute between the revision petitioner and the respondents has been harmoniously settled out of court. therefore, the revision petitioner is no longer desirous to prosecute the revision petition. hence, the revision petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. the said submission is recorded.r.p.(f.c.) no.419 of 2010 3 in the light of the above submission, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. the registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the family court, malappuram, for further proceedings, if any necessary. sd/- c.s.dias, judge rmm26/10/2023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 4TH KARTHIKA, 1945 RPFC NO. 419 OF 2010 AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 229/2010 OF FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM REVISION PETITIONER: ASHRAF,S/O SAITHALAVI, BAPPUNVINDE PURAKKAL, SREEDHAR NURSERY ROAD, PO CHETTIPPADI, PARAPPANANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. THROUGH POWER HOLDER, SISTER REBIMOL @ KUNHIMOL. BY ADV SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENTS: 1 ILMIYATH, D/O ABDUL RAHIMAN KUTTY, PALAKKAVALAPPIL, TANUR. 2 ALFA MINOR 2 YEARS DO. DO. DO. REPRESENTED BY MOTHER 1ST RESPONDENT.

THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.(F.C.) NO.419 OF 2010 2 Dated this the 26th day of October, 2023

ORDER

The revision petition is filed challenging the order

passed in M.C.No.229/2010 of the Family Court, Malappuram, ordering the revision petitioner to pay maintenance to the respondents - his wife and daughter at the rate of Rs.2500/- and Rs.500/- per month, respectively.

2. Heard; Sri. K.K.Mohammed Ravuf, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision

petitioner submitted that subsequent to the filing of the revision petition, the subject matter in dispute between the revision petitioner and the respondents has been harmoniously settled out of court. Therefore, the revision petitioner is no longer desirous to prosecute the revision petition. Hence, the revision petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. The said submission is recorded.

R.P.(F.C.) NO.419 OF 2010 3 In the light of the above submission, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Family Court, Malappuram, for further proceedings, if any necessary. Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rmm26/10/2023

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial