Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Moideen vs Kuduva Kunhami

Moideen vs Kuduva Kunhami

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 27, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1362956

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/808/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Moideen

Respondent

Kuduva Kunhami

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan monday, the 27th day of february 2023 / 8th phalguna, 1944 against the judgment and decree dated 11.10.2012 in os 110/2010 of sub court, vatakara appellant/plaintiff in o.s.110/2010 - sub court, vatakara:moideen, aged 46 years, s/o.ammad, business, residing at nangimannil, vallil chetiankandy, post adukkath, maruthaokara village, adukkath desom, vatakara taluk, kozhikode district, kerala state- by wife, attorney & agent- malayil meethal sameera d/o.moidu haji, aged 36 years, housewife, residing at vallil, chorode village, kurikkilad desom, post kurikkilad, vatakara taluk, kozhikode district, kerala state-673 104. by advs.sri.b.krishnan sri.r.parthasarathyrespondents/defendants in o.s.110/2010-sub court, vatakara:1 kuduva kunhami, aged 67 years, d/o.ammad, housewife, residing at nangimannil, malopoyil, post adukkath, 2 suhara, aged 49 years, d/o.ammad, housewife, residing at areekkara, vallil chetiankandi, post adukkath, 3 shahida, aged 42 years, d/o.ammad, housewife, residing at vannathankandiyil, vallil chetiankandi, post adukkath, maruthonkara village, adukkath desom, vatakara taluk, kozhikode district, kerala state-673 508. 4 jamal, aged 48 years, s/o.ammad, business, residing at nangimannil, vallil chetiankandi post adukkath, by adv. sri.rajesh v.nair-r1 to r3 r4 by advs.sri.shyam padman sri.a.ranjith narayan sri.s.k.saju this regular first appeal having come up for hearing on 27.02.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmenta memo was submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. hence, the appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge msp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 8TH PHALGUNA, 1944 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.10.2012 IN OS 110/2010 OF SUB COURT, VATAKARA APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF IN O.S.110/2010 - SUB COURT, VATAKARA:

MOIDEEN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.AMMAD, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT NANGIMANNIL, VALLIL CHETIANKANDY, POST ADUKKATH, MARUTHAOKARA VILLAGE, ADUKKATH DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE- BY WIFE, ATTORNEY & AGENT- MALAYIL MEETHAL SAMEERA D/O.MOIDU HAJI, AGED 36 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, RESIDING AT VALLIL, CHORODE VILLAGE, KURIKKILAD DESOM, POST KURIKKILAD, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE-673 104. BY ADVS.SRI.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY

RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS IN O.S.110/2010-SUB COURT, VATAKARA:

1 KUDUVA KUNHAMI, AGED 67 YEARS, D/O.AMMAD, HOUSEWIFE, RESIDING AT NANGIMANNIL, MALOPOYIL, POST ADUKKATH, 2 SUHARA, AGED 49 YEARS, D/O.AMMAD, HOUSEWIFE, RESIDING AT AREEKKARA, VALLIL CHETIANKANDI, POST ADUKKATH, 3 SHAHIDA, AGED 42 YEARS, D/O.AMMAD, HOUSEWIFE, RESIDING AT VANNATHANKANDIYIL, VALLIL CHETIANKANDI, POST ADUKKATH, MARUTHONKARA VILLAGE, ADUKKATH DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE-673 508. 4 JAMAL, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.AMMAD, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT NANGIMANNIL, VALLIL CHETIANKANDI POST ADUKKATH, BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH V.NAIR-R1 TO R3 R4 BY ADVS.SRI.SHYAM PADMAN SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYAN SRI.S.K.SAJU THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 27.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

A memo was submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. Hence, the appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial