Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

BEEVI Vs State of Kerala,

BEEVI vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2023
~5 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1362850

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/17105/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

BEEVI

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....school till a decision is taken by the government and duly communicate to the petitioner, ii.to dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents; iii. to grant such other and further reliefs as are just, proper and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.”2. the main grievance of the petitioner is that the 1 strespondent have not finalised the proceedings as evident by exts.p10 and p11 within the time frame fixed by this court and the 5 th respondent is effecting appointment in the school before final orders are passed.3. i heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thegovernment pleader. no notice is necessary to respondents 5 to 11 at this stage. if they are aggrieved by the directions issued by this court they are free to file a review petition.4. when this writ petition came up for admission, thiscourt directed to get instruction why final orders are not passed after the enquiry conducted as per ext.p10 and p11. the government pleader on instruction submitted that ten days time is necessary for passing final orders. if that is the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to pass final orders based on exts.p10 and p11 within ten days and till then no fresh appointment shall be made by the 5th respondent. therefore this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions.1. the 1st respondent will pass consequential orderbased on enquiry conducted as evident by exts.p10 and p11, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of ten days from today and communicate the same to the petitioner forthwith. till orders are passed and the same is communicated to the petitioner and other respondents 5 to 11no fresh appointment shall be made by the 5th respondent in the school.2. petitioner will produce a certified copy of thisjudgment before the 1st respondent and 5th respondent forcompliance. sd/- p.v. kunhikrishnan, judge jma appendix of wp(c) 17105/2023 petitioner exhibits.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2023 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 17105 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: BEEVI AGED 56 YEARS W/O. ALI, AGED 56 YEARS, KAPPIL HOUSE, VELLIYANCHERI PO, CHERIPARAMB, EDAPPATTA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT -, PIN - BY ADVS. K.MOHANAKANNAN D.S.THUSHARA RESPONDENT/S:

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -, PIN - 2 DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-, PIN - 695014 3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AUPS MALAPPURAM, NH 213, DOWN HILL, MALAPPURAM-, PIN - 4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MANJERI - WANDOOR ROAD, WANDOOR, MALAPPURAM-, PIN - 5 THE MANAGER VENGOOR A.M. HIGH SCHOOL, VENGOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-, PIN - 679325 6 P. ABULLAKUTTY, S/O. MUHAMMAD @ KUNHANI HAJI, PULIYAKUTHHOUSE, PATTIKKAD PO,PERINTHALMANNA MALAPPURAM DISTRICT -, 7 AYISHAKUTTY, D/O. PULIYAKKUTHMUHAMMAD @ KUNHANI HAJI, PULIYAKKUTH HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT -,

8 FATHIMA, D/O. PULIYAKKUTH MUHAMMAD @ KUNHANI HAJI, PULIYAKKUTH HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-, 9 ALI S/O. PULIYAKKUTH MUHAMMAD @ KUNHANI HAJI, PULIYAKKUTH HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT -, 10 HANEEFA, S/O. PULIYAKKUTH MUHAMMAD @ KUNHANI HAJI, PULIYAKKUTH HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT -, 11 MAJEED, S/O. PULIYAKKUTH MUHAMMAD @ KUNHANI HAJI, PULIYAKKUTH HOUSE, PATTIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-,

OTHER PRESENT: SMT.NISHA BOSE, SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN,J -------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.17105/2023 ----------------------- Dated : 31st May, 2023

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

i.To issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction directing the 1 st respondent to finalize the proceedings, evident from Exts.P10 and P11 within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court and to restrain the 5th respondent from effecting any appointments in the School till a decision is taken by the Government and duly communicate to the petitioner, ii.To dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents; iii. To grant such other and further reliefs as are just, proper and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the 1 st

respondent have not finalised the proceedings as evident by Exts.P10 and P11 within the time frame fixed by this Court and the 5 th respondent is effecting appointment in the school before final orders are passed.

3. I heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

Government Pleader. No notice is necessary to respondents 5 to 11 at this stage. If they are aggrieved by the directions issued by this Court they are free to file a review petition.

4. When this writ petition came up for admission, this

Court directed to get instruction why final orders are not passed after the enquiry conducted as per Ext.P10 and P11. The Government Pleader on instruction submitted that ten days time is necessary for passing final orders. If that is the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to pass final orders based on Exts.P10 and P11 within ten days and till then no fresh appointment shall be made by the 5th respondent. Therefore this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions.

1. The 1st respondent will pass consequential order

based on enquiry conducted as evident by Exts.P10 and P11, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of ten days from today and communicate the same to the petitioner forthwith. Till orders are passed and the same is communicated to the petitioner and other respondents 5 to 11no fresh appointment shall be made by the 5th respondent in the school.

2. Petitioner will produce a certified copy of this

judgment before the 1st respondent and 5th respondent for

compliance. Sd/- P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, Judge jma APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17105/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE LEGAL HEIRS OF MUHAMMAD @ KUNHANI HAJI, THE FORMER MANAGER OF THE SCHOOL Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE OF THE FATHER OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FAMILY MEMBERSHIP CERTIFICATE DATED 14-8-2013 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED

BY THE 5 TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 4 TH RESPONDENT DATED 20-6-2013 AND THE DECLARATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS AND OTHERS

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25- 01-2022 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1 ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE TITLE DEED NO.3935/1992 WITH TYPED COPY Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE HEARING NOTICE ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE HEARING NOTICE ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE HEARING NOTICE ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO THE PETITIONER, NO. GEDN- F2/26/2022-G.EDN DATED 20/10/2022 Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED Exhibit P13 THE ARGUMENT NOTE SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT ON Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN IA NO.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial