Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Akbar Ali Vs. State of Bihar

Akbar Ali vs State of Bihar

Disposition Appeal Allowed Court Patna Decided Sep 27, 1996
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/136199

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Appeal No. 55 of 1985
Subject
;Criminal
Disposition
Appeal Allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302--Murder of young married lady--By her husband, just about two years' of marriage--Motive of murder stated to be that husband had sold all her ornaments and was torturing her when she protested his that act-They were living in rented room and on right of murder, both went to slee...

Key legal issue
;Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Appeal Allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Akbar Ali

Respondent

State of Bihar

Excerpt

indian penal code, 1860 - section 302--murder of young married lady--by her husband, just about two years' of marriage--motive of murder stated to be that husband had sold all her ornaments and was torturing her when she protested his that act-they were living in rented room and on right of murder, both went to sleep--big black mark on neck was found after her murder which was detected in morning--husband was absconding-all these evidences fully establish murder--conviction, thus, maintained. - onkar nath asthana, j.1. though the respondent is served, no one appears for the respondent.2. leave granted.3. the appellant is the wife, against whom her husband and obtained an ex-parte decree of divorce. after obtaining the decree, the husband died. the wife on coming to know of the ex-parte decree, applied for setting aside the decree of divorce under order ix rule 13 of the code of civil procedure. the trial court dismissed the said application observing that since the divorce is a personal remedy, it cannot be pursued after the death of the husband. on appeal, the trial court's view was reversed. but the appellate court's view has in turn been reversed by the high court.4. we are of the opinion that the wife should be and is competent to maintain the application under order xi, rule 13. even though the husband is dead, yet the decree obtained by him is effective in law and determines the status of the appellant. if the appellant says that it is an ex-parte decree and ought to be set aside, her application has to be heard on merits. the decree of divorce determines her status as a wife apart from determining her rights in the properties of her deceased husband. this gives her sufficient locus standi and right to contest the divorce proceedings even after the death of her husband.5. accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted to the trial court to dispose of the application filed by the appellant under order ix, rule 13 on merits in accordance with law. no costs.6. ms. bina gupta says that the appellant has been provided a job in the electricity board on compassionate grounds on the basis that she is the wife of the deceased employee. pending disposal of the divorce proceedings finally, it is directed that she will not be disturbed from the said post.

Full Judgment

Onkar Nath Asthana, J.

1. Though the respondent is served, no one appears for the respondent.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appellant is the wife, against whom her husband and obtained an ex-parte decree of divorce. After obtaining the decree, the husband died. The wife on coming to know of the ex-parte decree, applied for setting aside the decree of divorce under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Trial Court dismissed the said application observing that since the divorce is a personal remedy, it cannot be pursued after the death of the husband. On appeal, the Trial Court's view was reversed. But the Appellate Court's view has in turn been reversed by the High Court.

4. We are of the opinion that the wife should be and is competent to maintain the application under Order XI, Rule 13. Even though the husband is dead, yet the decree obtained by him is effective in law and determines the status of the appellant. If the appellant says that it is an ex-parte decree and ought to be set aside, her application has to be heard on merits. The decree of divorce determines her status as a wife apart from determining her rights in the properties of her deceased husband. This gives her sufficient locus standi and right to contest the divorce proceedings even after the death of her husband.

5. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted to the Trial Court to dispose of the application filed by the appellant under Order IX, Rule 13 on merits in accordance with law. No costs.

6. Ms. Bina Gupta says that the appellant has been provided a job in the Electricity Board on compassionate grounds on the basis that she is the wife of the deceased employee. Pending disposal of the divorce proceedings finally, it is directed that she will not be disturbed from the said post.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial