Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Maya vs the Assistant Commissioner of Police

MAYA vs The Assistant Commissioner of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 07, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1361812

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/14228/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MAYA

Respondent

The Assistant Commissioner of Police

Excerpt

.....this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 07.12.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgment(dated this the 7th day of december, 2023) this writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- “i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondents 1 and 2 to give adequate and effective police protection to the life of the petitioners and their family members. ii) issue such other further orders deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. iii) award the cost of the petitioners in this proceedings.”2. on 15.07.2020 there was an orderdirecting 2nd respondent to ensure that law andorder is maintained.3. the learned counsel for the 3rd respondenttoday submits that there is no threat from their side to the petitioners. recording the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to move the station house officer, in case of any threat from the party respondents . therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/- basant balaji judge rpr appendix of wp(c) 14228/2020 petitioner’s exhibits exhibit p1 the true copy of the judgment dated 30.06.2016 in o.s.no.126/2016 of munsiff court, s.paravoor. exhibit p2 the true copy of the land tax no.kl02032204042/2020d dated 10.06.2020 issued by the chathannoor village office. exhibit p3 true copy of the complaint dated 07.07.2020 submitted the before the 1st respondent. exhibit p4 true copy of the acknowledgment receipt of the complaint dated 07.07.2020.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 14228 OF 2020 PETITIONERS: 1 MAYA AGED 33 YEARS W/O.RATHEESH, CHATHANVILA HOUSE, CHATHANNUR EDANADU P.O., MEENADU, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2 RATHEESH, AGED 39 YEARS S/O.RADHA, CHATHANVILA HOUSE, CHATHANNUR EDANADU P.O., MEENADU, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV M.L.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE O/O.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 572. 2 THE CIRCLE OF POLICE, CHATHANNOOR POLICE STATION, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM, PIN-691 572. 3 MANJU, AGED 42 YEARS D/O.SAHADEVAN, MALAYATTUKONAM BIJU BHAVAN, CHATHANNUR EDANADU P.O., MEENADU, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 572. BY ADV SRI.B.MOHANLAL OTHER PRESENT: GP SREEJITH V.S THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 7th day of December, 2023) This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- “i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondents 1 and 2 to give adequate and effective police protection to the life of the petitioners and their family members. ii) Issue such other further orders deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. iii) Award the cost of the petitioners in this proceedings.”

2. on 15.07.2020 there was an order

directing 2nd respondent to ensure that law and

order is maintained.

3. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent

today submits that there is no threat from their side to the petitioners. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to move the Station House Officer, in case of any threat from the party respondents . Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- BASANT BALAJI JUDGE rpr APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14228/2020 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.06.2016 IN O.S.NO.126/2016 OF MUNSIFF COURT, S.PARAVOOR. EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX NO.KL02032204042/2020D DATED 10.06.2020 ISSUED BY THE CHATHANNOOR VILLAGE OFFICE. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 07.07.2020 SUBMITTED THE BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 07.07.2020.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial