Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jasmine vs Abdul Karim

Jasmine vs Abdul Karim

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1360167

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/391/1996

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jasmine

Respondent

Abdul Karim

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice mohammed nias c.p. wednesday, the 31st day of may 2023 / 10th jyaishta, 1945 rp no. 391 of 1996 against the order/judgment in in op 11944/1993 of high court of kerala review petitioners/respondents 4 and 6 in the o.p.: 1 jasmine, d/o.siddique, varkala, jas vihar, odayammukkil, varkala. 2 rukhiya beevi, w/o.siddique, jas vihar, odayammukkil, varkala by adv sri.b.suresh kumar respondents/petitioners in the op & respondents 1 to 3, 5,7 & 8 in the op:1 abdul karim, s/o.aliyummar, panjikakudi house, varkala, trivandrum dist. 2 siraji, s/o.siddique, 3 ansar, s/o.siddique, jas vihar, odayammukkil, varkala1 4 kunjumon, s/o.siddique, 5 nisha, d/o.siddique, 6 the sub inspector of police, varkala police station, varkala 7 the circle inspector of police, varkala by advs. sri.p.vijaya bhanu smt.m.n.yamuna bai by smt.vinitha.b. sr.gpthis review petition having come up for admission on 31.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: mohammed nias. c.p.,j ----------- ------------------ dated this the 31st day of may, 2023orderlearned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. hence, the review petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/-mohammed nias c.p., judge dlk/31.5.2023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2023 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1945 RP NO. 391 OF 1996 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN IN OP 11944/1993 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 4 AND 6 IN THE O.P.: 1 JASMINE, D/O.SIDDIQUE, VARKALA, JAS VIHAR, ODAYAMMUKKIL, VARKALA. 2 RUKHIYA BEEVI, W/O.SIDDIQUE, JAS VIHAR, ODAYAMMUKKIL, VARKALA BY ADV SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS IN THE OP & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3, 5,7 & 8 IN THE OP:

1 ABDUL KARIM, S/O.ALIYUMMAR, PANJIKAKUDI HOUSE, VARKALA, TRIVANDRUM DIST. 2 SIRAJI, S/O.SIDDIQUE, 3 ANSAR, S/O.SIDDIQUE, JAS VIHAR, ODAYAMMUKKIL, VARKALA1 4 KUNJUMON, S/O.SIDDIQUE, 5 NISHA, D/O.SIDDIQUE, 6 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION, VARKALA 7 THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SMT.M.N.YAMUNA BAI BY SMT.VINITHA.B. SR.GP

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MOHAMMED NIAS. C.P.,J ----------- ------------------ Dated this the 31st day of May, 2023

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the review petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JUDGE dlk/31.5.2023

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial