Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Habeeb vs State of Kerala,

Habeeb vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 29, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1359946

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/3755/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Habeeb

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....suhair c.a abey george harish v.s. ramu subhash ananthakrishnan r. swaminathan k.s.respondent/s: 1 state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala,, pin - 682031 2 station house officer, palluruthy police station, ernakulam district, pin - 682005 sri tr renjith sr pp this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 29.05.2023, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.m.c no.3755 of 2023 2orderthis petition is filed by accused nos.1 and 2 in crime no.850/2023 of the palluruthy police station. in the aforesaid case, they face prosecution for having committed the offences punishable under sections 7 and 8 of the kerala gambling act, 1960, and section 4(a) and 7(3) of the lotteries (regulation) act, 1998. they have approached this court seeking to quash all further proceedings on the ground that the allegations in the fir will not constitute any of the offences alleged against them.2. when the matter is taken up for consideration, it is submitted bythe learned public prosecutor that even prior to the filing of this petition, the police has filed a final report before the learned judicial magistrate of first class iii, ernakulam, on 10.04.2023. in that view of the matter, reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the final report, this petition is closed. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v, judge ns crl.m.c no.3755 of 2023 3 appendix of crl.mc 3755/2023 petitioner annexures : annexure a1 the certified copy of the fir in crime ernakulam district, along with the first information statement is produced

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 3755 OF 2023 CRIME NO.850/2023 OF PALLURUTHY POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1 & 2 : 1 HABEEB AGED 53 YEARS S/O. ABDUL RAHMAN, RESIDING AT KLATHI PARAMBU VEEDU, HOUSE NO 13/556 KMP NAGAR, PALLURUTY, EDAKOCHI VILLAGE, PIN - 682010 2 RAJU V.P AGED 52 YEARS, S/O PAREEKUTTY RESIDING AT VELYPARAMBIL VEEDU, KACHERIPADY, PALLURUTHY, PALLURUTHY VILLAGE, KOCHI., PIN - 682018 BY ADVS. SAM ISAAC POTHIYIL VIPIN M.V. MUHAMMED SUHAIR C.A ABEY GEORGE HARISH V.S. RAMU SUBHASH ANANTHAKRISHNAN R. SWAMINATHAN K.S.

RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,, PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PALLURUTHY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682005 SRI TR RENJITH SR PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C No.3755 of 2023 2

ORDER

This petition is filed by accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.850/2023 of the Palluruthy Police Station. In the aforesaid case, they face prosecution for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 7 and 8 of the Kerala Gambling Act, 1960, and Section 4(a) and 7(3) of the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998. They have approached this Court seeking to quash all further proceedings on the ground that the allegations in the FIR will not constitute any of the offences alleged against them.

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is submitted by

the learned Public Prosecutor that even prior to the filing of this petition, the police has filed a final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class III, Ernakulam, on 10.04.2023. In that view of the matter, reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the final report, this petition is closed. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE NS Crl.M.C No.3755 of 2023 3 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3755/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES : Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, ALONG WITH THE FIRST INFORMATION STATEMENT IS PRODUCED

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial