Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Srihari vs State of Kerala

Srihari vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1359671

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(Crl.)/453/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Srihari

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.b.suresh kumar & the honourable mrs. justice c.s. sudha tuesday, the 30th day of may 2023 / 9th jyaishta, 1945 wp(crl.) no. 453 of 2023 petitioner: srihari s.n., aged 23 years, sunil nivas, chandanakavu, alappuzha, pin - 688011 manu harshakumar hari krishnan k. devi r. raj omanakuttan t.n. respondents:1 state of kerala represented by the secretary to government, home department, government secretariate, thiruvanathapuram, pin - 695001 2 the superintendent of police collectrate po, kottayam district represented by public prosecutor high court of kerala - 682013 3 the station house officer kottayam east police station, kottayam district represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala - 682013 4 velkumar gouri sankaram, near kopparathu temple collectorate po kottayam, pin - 686002 5 chithambaram v w/o velkumar gouri sankaram near kopparathu temple collectorate po kottayam, pin - 686002e.c.bineesh public prosecutor sajith kumar v. vivek a.v.(k/000531/2017) godwin joseph(k/001422/2018) alka warriar(k/001332/2023) neeraja venugopal(k/000961/2023)this writ petition (criminal) having come up for admission on 30.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: p.b.suresh kumar & c.s.sudha, jj. dated this the 30th day of may, 2023.judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed. in the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. p.b.suresh kumar, judge. c.s.sudha, judge. ykb

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(CRL.) NO. 453 OF 2023 PETITIONER: SRIHARI S.N., AGED 23 YEARS, SUNIL NIVAS, CHANDANAKAVU, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688011 MANU HARSHAKUMAR HARI KRISHNAN K. DEVI R. RAJ OMANAKUTTAN T.N. RESPONDENTS:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE COLLECTRATE PO, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA - 682013 3 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER KOTTAYAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA - 682013 4 VELKUMAR GOURI SANKARAM, NEAR KOPPARATHU TEMPLE COLLECTORATE PO KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686002 5 CHITHAMBARAM V W/O VELKUMAR GOURI SANKARAM NEAR KOPPARATHU TEMPLE COLLECTORATE PO KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686002

E.C.BINEESH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Sajith Kumar V. VIVEK A.V.(K/000531/2017) GODWIN JOSEPH(K/001422/2018) ALKA WARRIAR(K/001332/2023) NEERAJA VENUGOPAL(K/000961/2023)

THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.B.SURESH KUMAR & C.S.SUDHA, JJ. Dated this the 30th day of May, 2023.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE. C.S.SUDHA, JUDGE. YKB

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial