Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

T.M.Thomas vs Gopinathan

T.M.Thomas vs Gopinathan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 13, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1359294

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/245/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T.M.Thomas

Respondent

Gopinathan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias thursday, the 13th day of april 2023 / 23rd chaithra, 1945 op(c) no. 245 of 2014 in os 662/2000 of munsiff court ,pathanamthitta petitioner: t.m.thomas s/o. t.p.mathai, thadathukalayil house, kidangannur village, kozhencherry. by advs. sri.m.p.madhavankutty sri.gokul das v.v.h. respondents: 1 gopinathan s/o. narayanan, vazhayil, puthenparambil, kidangannur muri, kidangannur village, kozhencherry-689 641. 2 sheeja gopinathan ( sought to be impleaded ) w/o. gopinathan, vazhayil puthenparambil house, kidnagannur muri, kidangannur village, kozhencherry, pathanamthitta district ( sought to be impleaded )by advs. sri.jacob p.alex no advocate sri.joseph p.alex this op (civil) having come up for admission on 13.04.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: o.p.(c)no.245/2014 :2: dated this the 13th day of april, 2023judgmentthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter in dispute between the parties has been settled out of court.2. the said submission is recorded. the original petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- c.s.dias,judge dst/13.04.23 //true copy/ p.a.to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 245 OF 2014 IN OS 662/2000 OF MUNSIFF COURT ,PATHANAMTHITTA PETITIONER: T.M.THOMAS S/O. T.P.MATHAI, THADATHUKALAYIL HOUSE, KIDANGANNUR VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY. BY ADVS. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY SRI.GOKUL DAS V.V.H. RESPONDENTS: 1 GOPINATHAN S/O. NARAYANAN, VAZHAYIL, PUTHENPARAMBIL, KIDANGANNUR MURI, KIDANGANNUR VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY-689 641. 2 SHEEJA GOPINATHAN ( SOUGHT TO BE IMPLEADED ) W/O. GOPINATHAN, VAZHAYIL PUTHENPARAMBIL HOUSE, KIDNAGANNUR MURI, KIDANGANNUR VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT ( SOUGHT TO BE IMPLEADED )

BY ADVS. SRI.JACOB P.ALEX NO ADVOCATE SRI.JOSEPH P.ALEX THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(C)No.245/2014 :2: Dated this the 13th day of April, 2023

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter in dispute between the parties has been settled out of court.

2. The said submission is recorded. The original petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/13.04.23 //True copy/ P.A.To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial