Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vysakh vs the Director

Vysakh vs The Director

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 02, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1358487

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/14954/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vysakh

Respondent

The Director

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice murali purushothaman tuesday, the 2nd day of may 2023 / 12th vaisakha, 1945 wp(c) no. 14954 of 2023 petitioner: vysakh s/o. viswambharam, pushpavilasom, kadika muri, kaithaparambu p.o., pathanamthitta district, pin - 691526 by advs. arun mathew vadakkan n.cherian kurian steffy v.j. respondents: 1 the director department of mining and geology, kesavadasapuram, pattam palace po, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 6950042 the geologist, 3 the assistant geologist, other present: smt resmitha ramachandran-gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 02.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p.(c) no. 14954 of 2023 2murali purushothaman, j.w.p.(c) no. 14954 of 2023 dated this the 2nd day of may, 2023judgmentthe petitioner states that he had submitted ext.p4 application with necessary documents before the 2 nd respondent for granting permit to remove earth for construction of his residential building. the grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent has not considered the said application. there will be a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider ext.p4 and pass orders in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. writ petition is disposed of. sd/- murali purushothaman judge mtk w.p.(c) no. 14954 of 2023 3 appendix of wp(c) 14954/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the land tax receipt dated 2.11.2020 issued by village officer, adoor village exhibit p2 true copy of the possession certificate dated 2.11.2020 issued by village officer, adoor village exhibit p3 true copy of the site approval and building permit issued to the petitioner by the adoor municipal corporation dated 11.03.2022 exhibit p4 true copy of the application submitted by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent for granting permit for earth removing dated 13.4.2022

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MAY 2023 / 12TH VAISAKHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 14954 OF 2023 PETITIONER: VYSAKH S/O. VISWAMBHARAM, PUSHPAVILASOM, KADIKA MURI, KAITHAPARAMBU P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 691526 BY ADVS. ARUN MATHEW VADAKKAN N.CHERIAN KURIAN STEFFY V.J. RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM PALACE PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004

2 THE GEOLOGIST, 3 THE ASSISTANT GEOLOGIST, OTHER PRESENT: SMT RESMITHA RAMACHANDRAN-GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 14954 of 2023 2

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.

W.P.(C) No. 14954 of 2023 Dated this the 2nd day of May, 2023

JUDGMENT

The petitioner states that he had submitted Ext.P4 application with necessary documents before the 2 nd respondent for granting permit to remove earth for construction of his residential building. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent has not considered the said application. There will be a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider Ext.P4 and pass orders in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE mtk W.P.(C) No. 14954 of 2023 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14954/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 2.11.2020 ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER, ADOOR VILLAGE Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 2.11.2020 ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER, ADOOR VILLAGE Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SITE APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE ADOOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DATED 11.03.2022 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR GRANTING PERMIT FOR EARTH REMOVING DATED 13.4.2022

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial