Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sr. Reena Ittyachan vs State of Kerala

Sr. Reena Ittyachan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1357538

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/14533/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sr. Reena Ittyachan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....- 680732 5 union of india represented by the secretary to government, ministry of human resources development, department of higher education, shastri bhavan, new delhi, pin - 110001 s. krishnamoorthy s julian xavier.j joseph firoz k.robin(f-15) roy joseph(k/55/2006) anies mathew(k/952/2007) anjana ram(k/000695/2020) nirmal kurien eapen(k/000151/2022) this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p (c) no.14533/2023 -2-judgmentlearned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo to the effect that certain factual mistakes have been crept in the writ petition. he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. taking note of the memo filed by the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty reserved as above. sd/- gopinath p. judge amg w.p (c) no.14533/2023 -3- appendix of wp(c) 14533/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the certificate of accreditation issued by the national assessment and accreditation council dated 23.1.2017 exhibit p2 true copy of the reply no. 229930/cde-e-asst- exhibit p3 true copy of the judgment in w.p.(c) no. 35018/2022 dated 22.12.2022 exhibit p4 true copy of the proceedings no. 229980/cde-e-asst- exhibit p5 true copy of letter no. f.22-1/2022(ac) dated 14.7.2022 exhibit p6 true copy of that reply no. 197757/cdc-e-asst- exhibit p7 true copy of the news item appeared in malayala manorama daily dated 16.11.2022 exhibit p8 true copy of reply no. 229930/cdc-e-asst- exhibit p9 true copy of the reply no. f-1-/2022/(ac) dated 8.8.2022

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 14533 OF 2023 PETITIONER: SR. REENA ITTYACHAN AGED 51 YEARS DR. LATE K.C. ITTYACHAN, PRINCIPAL, S.H. COLLEGE, CHALAKUDY, TRISSUR, PIN - 680307 ELIZEBATH GEORGE M.S.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION OFFICE, BAHADURSHAH ZAFAR MARG, ITO METRO GATE NUMBER 3, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110002 3 UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THENJIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 673635 4 CARMEL COLLEGE REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER, MALA, THRISSUR, PIN - 680732 5 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001 S. KRISHNAMOORTHY S JULIAN XAVIER.J JOSEPH FIROZ K.ROBIN(F-15) ROY JOSEPH(K/55/2006) ANIES MATHEW(K/952/2007) ANJANA RAM(K/000695/2020) NIRMAL KURIEN EAPEN(K/000151/2022) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P (C) No.14533/2023 -2-

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo to the effect that certain factual mistakes have been crept in the writ petition. He prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Taking note of the memo filed by the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty reserved as above. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE AMG W.P (C) No.14533/2023 -3- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14533/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL DATED 23.1.2017 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NO. 229930/CDE-E-ASST- Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO. 35018/2022 DATED 22.12.2022 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO. 229980/CDE-E-ASST- Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. F.22-1/2022(AC) DATED 14.7.2022 Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THAT REPLY NO. 197757/CDC-E-ASST- Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM APPEARED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 16.11.2022 Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF REPLY NO. 229930/CDC-E-ASST- Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NO. F-1-/2022/(AC) DATED 8.8.2022

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial