Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nalini vs Rajan

Nalini vs RAJAN

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 28, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1357528

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/958/2005

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nalini

Respondent

RAJAN

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice m.r.anitha tuesday, the 28th day of february 2023 / 9th phalguna, 1944 rsa no. 958 of 2005 against the judgment and decree dated 05.2.2004 in a.s. no.104/2002 of principal sub court, alappuzha against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.1999 in o.s. no.299/1997 of principal munsiff's court, alappuzha appellant/respondent/plaintiff: nalini, d/o kocika, aged 49 years, eruvelikattu house, vadayar, vaikom. sri.k.ravu sri.vishnu.r respondent/appellant/defendant: 1 rajan, s/o sankaran, aged 56 years, residing at pokkathil chira, nehru trophy ward, aryad south village, ambalappuzha taluk, alappuzha. 2 pushpa, w/o rajan aged 53 years, residing at -do- -do-. sri.p.k.muraleedharan - r1 sri.sunu p.john - r1 this regular second appeal having come up for admission on 28.02.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa no.958 of 2005judgmentdated this the 28th day of february, 2023 this appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree in a.s no.104/2002 on the file of principal sub court, alappuzha, which arise out of judgment and decree in o.s no.299/1997 on the file of principal munsiff's court, alappuzha.2. it is reported by the learned counsel for therespondents that 1st respondent is no more. 2 nd respondent already expired in 2009. there was no representation for the appellant on the last posting date. today when the case is taken up, there is no representation for the appellant. in the above circumstances, the r.s.a. stands abated. sd/- m.r.anitha judge smf

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1944 RSA NO. 958 OF 2005 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.2.2004 IN A.S. NO.104/2002 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, ALAPPUZHA AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.06.1999 IN O.S. NO.299/1997 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, ALAPPUZHA APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: NALINI, D/O KOCIKA, AGED 49 YEARS, ERUVELIKATTU HOUSE, VADAYAR, VAIKOM. SRI.K.RAVU SRI.VISHNU.R RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: 1 RAJAN, S/O SANKARAN, AGED 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT POKKATHIL CHIRA, NEHRU TROPHY WARD, ARYAD SOUTH VILLAGE, AMBALAPPUZHA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA. 2 PUSHPA, W/O RAJAN AGED 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO-. SRI.P.K.MURALEEDHARAN - R1 SRI.SUNU P.JOHN - R1 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA No.958 of 2005

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28th day of February, 2023 This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree in A.S No.104/2002 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Alappuzha, which arise out of judgment and decree in O.S No.299/1997 on the file of Principal Munsiff's Court, Alappuzha.

2. It is reported by the learned counsel for the

respondents that 1st respondent is no more. 2 nd respondent already expired in 2009. There was no representation for the appellant on the last posting date. Today when the case is taken up, there is no representation for the appellant. In the above circumstances, the R.S.A. stands abated. Sd/- M.R.ANITHA JUDGE SMF

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial