Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anilkumar B vs State of Kerala

Anilkumar B vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1356909

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/14280/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anilkumar B

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh thursday, the 30th day of november 2023 / 9th agrahayana, 1945 wp(c) no. 14280 of 2023 petitioner: anilkumar b aged 55 years, proprietor of m/s. akshay cashews, s/o. bhaskaran, residing at 951, ezhukone p.o, kollam, pin - 691 505. b.j.john prakash p.pramel c.n.midhun colin alex amritha padmakumar sooraj m.s. respondents: 1 state of kerala represented by the principal secretary, fisheries, ports, environment and industries (coir and cashew) main block, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695 001. 2 state level banker's committee (slbc) represented by deputy general manager, slbc kerala, slbc cell, canara bank, circle office, canara bank building, m.g. road, trivandrum, pin - 695 001. 3 the south indian bank limited represented by its authorised officer, head office annex, chakkolas building, t.b. road, mission quarters, thrissur, pin - 680 001. :2: 4 m/s asset reconstruction company (india) limited represented by its managing director, the ruby, 10th floor, 29, senapati bapat marg, dardar (west), mumbai, pin - 400 028.reshmi thomas, government pleader sunil shanker b.s.suresh kumar vidya gangadharan jerin george this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.11.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: :3:judgmentdated this the 30th day of november, 2023 counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. the writ petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous. sd/- n. nagaresh judge amr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 14280 OF 2023 PETITIONER: ANILKUMAR B AGED 55 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. AKSHAY CASHEWS, S/O. BHASKARAN, RESIDING AT 951, EZHUKONE P.O, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 505. B.J.JOHN PRAKASH P.PRAMEL C.N.MIDHUN COLIN ALEX AMRITHA PADMAKUMAR SOORAJ M.S. RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FISHERIES, PORTS, ENVIRONMENT AND INDUSTRIES (COIR AND CASHEW) MAIN BLOCK, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001. 2 STATE LEVEL BANKER'S COMMITTEE (SLBC) REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, SLBC KERALA, SLBC CELL, CANARA BANK, CIRCLE OFFICE, CANARA BANK BUILDING, M.G. ROAD, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695 001. 3 THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, HEAD OFFICE ANNEX, CHAKKOLAS BUILDING, T.B. ROAD, MISSION QUARTERS, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 001. :2: 4 M/S ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE RUBY, 10TH FLOOR, 29, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, DARDAR (WEST), MUMBAI, PIN - 400 028.

RESHMI THOMAS, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SUNIL SHANKER B.S.SURESH KUMAR VIDYA GANGADHARAN JERIN GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :3:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30th day of November, 2023 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE AMR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial