Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rahul vs George B

RAHUL vs George B

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 29, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1356462

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/1707/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RAHUL

Respondent

George B

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. wednesday, the 29th day of november 2023 / 8th agrahayana, 1945 maca no. 1707 of 2014 against the order/judgment opmv 1683/2005 of motor accident claims tribunal ,neyyattinkara appellant/applicant: rahul aged 23 years s/o.rajagopalan nair, plankalaveedu, koovalasseri p.o., neyyattinkara. by adv sri.r.t.pradeep respondent/respondent 1& 2 & addl respondnet 3:1 george b kaithakuzhi puthenveedu, ariyamcode, neyyattinkara, 695126. 2 the manager united insurance company, neyyattinkara, 695121. 3 raveendran nageswari madom, sreevaraham, thiruvananthapuram, 695001. by adv sri.t.j.lakshmanan iyer this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 29.11.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: m.a.c.a no. 1707 of 2014judgmentno representation for the appellant. when the matter came up for consideration on 27.11.2023 also, there was no representation. as per order dated 31.03.2023, the appellant was directed to take steps to complete the service of notice on r1 and r3. as no steps were taken in compliance of the said order, on 16.10.2023, a further direction was issued, to take steps within a period of one week from the said date as last chance. even now, no steps were taken. therefore, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a judge rpk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 MACA NO. 1707 OF 2014 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OPMV 1683/2005 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,NEYYATTINKARA APPELLANT/APPLICANT: RAHUL AGED 23 YEARS S/O.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, PLANKALAVEEDU, KOOVALASSERI P.O., NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV SRI.R.T.PRADEEP RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT 1& 2 & ADDL RESPONDNET 3:

1 GEORGE B KAITHAKUZHI PUTHENVEEDU, ARIYAMCODE, NEYYATTINKARA, 695126. 2 THE MANAGER UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY, NEYYATTINKARA, 695121. 3 RAVEENDRAN NAGESWARI MADOM, SREEVARAHAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 695001. BY ADV SRI.T.J.LAKSHMANAN IYER THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.A.C.A No. 1707 of 2014

JUDGMENT

No representation for the appellant. When the matter came up for consideration on 27.11.2023 also, there was no representation. As per order dated 31.03.2023, the appellant was directed to take steps to complete the service of notice on R1 and R3. As no steps were taken in compliance of the said order, on 16.10.2023, a further direction was issued, to take steps within a period of one week from the said date as last chance. Even now, no steps were taken. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A JUDGE rpk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial