Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Raj Kumar vs State of Kerala

Raj Kumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 28, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1356364

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./3133/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raj Kumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. friday, the 28th day of april 2023 / 8th vaisakha, 1945 bail appl. no. 3133 of 2023 petitioners/accused 1 raj kumar aged 32 years s/o rajan, raj bhavanam, thodiyoor p.o, karunagappally, kollam, pin - 690523 2 rajan aged 57 years s/o kutty, raj bhavanam, thodiyoor p.o, karunagappally, kollam , pin - 690523 3 kumari aged 55 years w/o rajan, raj bhavanam, thodiyoor p.o, karunagappally, kollam ., pin - 690523 by advs. saju j panicker kurian k jose respondent/complainant 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin - 682031 2 the station house officer pandalam police station, pandalam p.o, pathanamthitta, pin - 689501 smt. seetha s, public prosecutor this bail application having come up for admission on 28.04.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: b.a. no.3133 of 2023orderdated this the 28th day of april , 2023 this application is submitted by the petitioners, apprehending arrest in connection with a crime registered by pandalam police station.2. today, when the matter came up for consideration,learned public prosecutor on instructions submitted that no crime has been registered against the petitioners. in such circumstances, this bail application is closed recording the above submission. however, it is clarified that, in case the presence of the petitioners is required in connection with an offence under section 498a of ipc, the same can be procured by the 2 nd respondent after issuing notice under section 41a of the cr.p.c. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a. judge smm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 8TH VAISAKHA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 3133 OF 2023 PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 RAJ KUMAR AGED 32 YEARS S/O RAJAN, RAJ BHAVANAM, THODIYOOR P.O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM, PIN - 690523 2 RAJAN AGED 57 YEARS S/O KUTTY, RAJ BHAVANAM, THODIYOOR P.O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM , PIN - 690523 3 KUMARI AGED 55 YEARS W/O RAJAN, RAJ BHAVANAM, THODIYOOR P.O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM ., PIN - 690523 BY ADVS. SAJU J PANICKER KURIAN K JOSE RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PANDALAM POLICE STATION, PANDALAM P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689501 SMT. SEETHA S, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A. No.3133 of 2023

ORDER

Dated this the 28th day of April , 2023 This application is submitted by the petitioners, apprehending arrest in connection with a crime registered by Pandalam Police Station.

2. Today, when the matter came up for consideration,

learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that no crime has been registered against the petitioners. In such circumstances, this bail application is closed recording the above submission. However, it is clarified that, in case the presence of the petitioners is required in connection with an offence under Section 498A of IPC, the same can be procured by the 2 nd respondent after issuing notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE smm

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial