Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pokker vs Ahammadkutty

Pokker vs Ahammadkutty

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1354849

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/750/2004

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pokker

Respondent

Ahammadkutty

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice k. babu saturday, the 30th day of september 2023 / 8th aswina, 1945 rsa no. 750 of 2004 against the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2003 in as os 129/1993 of munsiff court, tirurappellants: 1 pokker desom, p.o.ozhur tirur taluk,, malappuram 2 iyyathumma do.ahammad 3 biyyumma do. ahammed 4 subaida do. ahammed 5 ayishumma wo. ahammed 6 addl.ramla, w/o.pokkar,cholakkapulikaparambil, ozhoor r.s.a no.750/2004 2 7 addl.muhammed saheed, 8 addl.hafsath, district. (legal representatives of deceased 1st appellant are impleaded as addl.appellants 6 to 8 as per order dated 09.07.2014 in ia.1688/2014) sri.r.rajesh kormath sri.jaykar.k.s. smt.preethy karunakaran sri.rahul varma sri.v.s.robin smt.sanjana r.nairrespondents: 1 ahammadkutty 2 aidru and of moideen 3 pocker son of moideen 4 muhammad son of moideen r.s.a no.750/2004 3 5 ibrahim son of ahammed post box no.20814, ajman, u.a.e. 6 shamsu son of ahammed post box no.20814 ajman, u.a.e. 7 alavi so. aahammed cholakkapullikaparambil, p.o.ozhur,, tirur taluk, malappuram district. preethy karunakaran sri.t.krishnan unni sr. smt.m.r.mini smt.meena.a. this regular second appeal having come up for admission on 30.09.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: r.s.a no.750/2004 4judgmentadv.smt.preethy karunakaran, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that this regular second appeal is not pressed and a memo to that effect has been filed. therefore, this regular second appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (sd/-) k.babu, judge jsr/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU SATURDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 8TH ASWINA, 1945 RSA NO. 750 OF 2004 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2003 IN AS OS 129/1993 OF MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR

APPELLANTS: 1 POKKER DESOM, P.O.OZHUR TIRUR TALUK,, MALAPPURAM 2 IYYATHUMMA DO.AHAMMAD 3 BIYYUMMA DO. AHAMMED 4 SUBAIDA DO. AHAMMED 5 AYISHUMMA WO. AHAMMED 6 ADDL.RAMLA, W/O.POKKAR,CHOLAKKAPULIKAPARAMBIL, OZHOOR R.S.A No.750/2004 2 7 ADDL.MUHAMMED SAHEED, 8 ADDL.HAFSATH, DISTRICT. (LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED 1ST APPELLANT ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDL.APPELLANTS 6 TO 8 AS PER ORDER DATED 09.07.2014 IN IA.1688/2014) SRI.R.RAJESH KORMATH SRI.JAYKAR.K.S. SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN SRI.RAHUL VARMA SRI.V.S.ROBIN SMT.SANJANA R.NAIR

RESPONDENTS: 1 AHAMMADKUTTY 2 AIDRU AND OF MOIDEEN 3 POCKER SON OF MOIDEEN 4 MUHAMMAD SON OF MOIDEEN R.S.A No.750/2004 3 5 IBRAHIM SON OF AHAMMED POST BOX NO.20814, AJMAN, U.A.E. 6 SHAMSU SON OF AHAMMED POST BOX NO.20814 AJMAN, U.A.E. 7 ALAVI SO. AAHAMMED CHOLAKKAPULLIKAPARAMBIL, P.O.OZHUR,, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PREETHY KARUNAKARAN SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI SR. SMT.M.R.MINI SMT.MEENA.A. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.S.A No.750/2004 4

JUDGMENT

Adv.Smt.Preethy Karunakaran, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that this Regular Second Appeal is not pressed and a memo to that effect has been filed. Therefore, this Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (sd/-) K.BABU, JUDGE jsr/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial