State of Kerala vs Augustine Thomas

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2023

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1353478

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1353478
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Nias C.P.
Decided On: May 31, 2023
Case Number: RP/647/2004

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of Kerala

Respondent

Augustine Thomas

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice mohammed nias c.p. wednesday, the 31st day of may 2023 / 10th jyaishta, 1945 rp no. 647 of 2004 against the order/judgment in op 25747/2002 of high court of kerala review petitioner/s: 1 state of kerala secretary to government, department of finance,, 2 secretary department of public works 3 executive engineer public works department, (roads division), kottayam. 4 assistant executive engineer public works department, roads sub division,, vaikom. 5 assistant executive engineer public works department, roads sub-division,, kottayam. by sr. government pleader smt.vinitha b respondent/s: augustine thomas aged 51 years, alencherril house,, athirampuzha p.o., kottayam district. by advs. smt.a.kumari mini sri.babu joseph kuruvathazhathis review petition having come up for admission on 31.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: mohammed nias. c.p.,j ----------- ------------------ dated this the 31st day of may, 2023orderlearned counsel for the parties submit that they do not have any instructions in the matter. at this distance of time, there is no likelihood of the reliefs sought in the above case surviving. accordingly, the review petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the parties to file an application seeking restoration, if there is anything surviving for consideration on the basis of the cause of action urged in the above case. sd/-mohammed nias c.p., judge dlk/31.5.2023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2023 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1945 RP NO. 647 OF 2004 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 25747/2002 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE,, 2 SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (ROADS DIVISION), KOTTAYAM. 4 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ROADS SUB DIVISION,, VAIKOM. 5 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ROADS SUB-DIVISION,, KOTTAYAM. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.VINITHA B RESPONDENT/S: AUGUSTINE THOMAS AGED 51 YEARS, ALENCHERRIL HOUSE,, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SMT.A.KUMARI MINI SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MOHAMMED NIAS. C.P.,J ----------- ------------------ Dated this the 31st day of May, 2023

ORDER

Learned counsel for the parties submit that they do not have any instructions in the matter. At this distance of time, there is no likelihood of the reliefs sought in the above case surviving. Accordingly, the review petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the parties to file an application seeking restoration, if there is anything surviving for consideration on the basis of the cause of action urged in the above case. Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JUDGE dlk/31.5.2023

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties State of Kerala vs Augustine Thomas Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Nias C.P.