Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Radhakrishna Panicker vs Beena

Radhakrishna Panicker vs BEENA

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 25, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1352166

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/944/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Radhakrishna Panicker

Respondent

BEENA

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias friday, the 25th day of august 2023 / 3rd bhadra, 1945 op(c) no. 944 of 2021 petitioner/respondent/petitioner-plaintiff: radhakrishna panicker, s/o kochukrishna panicker, aged 70, karthika, thanneermukkam south village, by advs.dr.v.n.sankarjee v.n.madhusudanan r.udaya jyothi m.suseela respondents/appellants/respondents-defendants:1 beena, w/o muraleedhara panicker, aged 54, chengalakkattu, thanneermukkam, south village, perunthuruth muri, muhamma p o, cherthala taluk 2 jishnu m panicker, s/o muraleedhara panicker, aged 30 , chengalakkattu, thanneermkkam south village, alappuzha district, pin 688 525. 3 niranjana m panicker, d/o muraleedhara panicker, aged 23, chengalakkattu, thanneermukkam south village, perunthuruth muri, muhamma p o, cherthala taluk, alappuzha district, pin 688 525. adv.c.g.bindu adv.c.g.ajitha this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 25.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: o.p.(c)no.944 of 2021 :: 2 ::judgmentdated this the 25th day of august 2023 the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the original petition has become infructuous. the said submission is recorded. resultantly, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- c.s.dias judge jes

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 3RD BHADRA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 944 OF 2021 PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF: RADHAKRISHNA PANICKER, S/O KOCHUKRISHNA PANICKER, AGED 70, KARTHIKA, THANNEERMUKKAM SOUTH VILLAGE, BY ADVS.DR.V.N.SANKARJEE V.N.MADHUSUDANAN R.UDAYA JYOTHI M.SUSEELA RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS:

1 BEENA, W/O MURALEEDHARA PANICKER, AGED 54, CHENGALAKKATTU, THANNEERMUKKAM, SOUTH VILLAGE, PERUNTHURUTH MURI, MUHAMMA P O, CHERTHALA TALUK 2 JISHNU M PANICKER, S/O MURALEEDHARA PANICKER, AGED 30 , CHENGALAKKATTU, THANNEERMKKAM SOUTH VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN 688 525. 3 NIRANJANA M PANICKER, D/O MURALEEDHARA PANICKER, AGED 23, CHENGALAKKATTU, THANNEERMUKKAM SOUTH VILLAGE, PERUNTHURUTH MURI, MUHAMMA P O, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN 688 525. ADV.C.G.BINDU ADV.C.G.AJITHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(C)NO.944 OF 2021 :: 2 ::

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of August 2023 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the original petition has become infructuous. The said submission is recorded. Resultantly, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous. SD/- C.S.DIAS JUDGE jes

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial