Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anand vs State of Kerala

ANAND vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 17, 2023
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1351587

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./2749/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ANAND

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....by using the money given by the 2 nd and 3rd accused; the 1st accused was arrested while carrying the contraband, jointly purchased by the 2nd and 3rd accused when he was transporting the same and the details of call records between the petitioner and the other accused during the relevant period, to substantiate the involvement of the petitioner in this crime.5. this court dismissed the first bail applicationconsidering the fact that on perusal of the case diary, it was revealed that initially contraband to the tune of 106 gram of mdma was seized from the possession of the 1 st accused and later investigation revealed that the 1st accused purchased mdma by using the money handed over by the 2nd and 3rd accused and there are consistent calls in between the 1st accused, 2nd accused and 3rd accused during the relevant period. further, investigation in this crime was at the very initial stage and details were to be obtainedby the investigating officer. further in cases involving commercial quantity of contraband this court cannot grant regular bail to the petitioner without satisfying the conditions as provided under section 37 of the ndps act.6. in this second application for regular bail, nothingsubstantiated to take a different view, since the earlier bail application was dismissed holding that the rider under section 37 of the ndps act cannot be diluted.therefore, this bail application stands dismissed. sd/- (a. badharudeen, judge) rtr/ appendix of bail appl. 2749/2023 petitioner’s annexures annexure-a a true copy of the remand application in crime no. 273/2023 of kottarakara police station. annexure-b a true copy of the order dated 20.02.2023 in crl.m.c. no. 328 / 2023 of the principal sessions court, kollam. annexure-c a true copy of the order dated 22.03.2023 in b.a. no. 1706 / 2023.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 26TH SRAVANA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 2749 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER INCRMC 328/2023 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM CRIME NO.273/2023 OF KOTTARAKARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED(A2): ANAND, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O ANILKUMAR, ANEESH BHAVAN, VAVARKONAM, KATTAYIKONAM P.O., AYIROORPPARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695584. BY ADVS. K.V.ANIL KUMAR SWAPNA VIJAYAN RADHIKA S.ANIL RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682031. SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI P G MANU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.08.2023, THE COURT ON 17.08.2023 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

A. BADHARUDEEN, J.

================================ B.A.No.2749 of 2023 ================================ Dated this the 17th day of August, 2023

ORDER

This is the second application for regular bail filed by the 2 nd accused in Crime No.273/2023 of Kottarakkara Police Station, where the prosecution alleges commission of offence punishable under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (`NDPS Act’ for short hereinafter).

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary as such.

3. The prosecution allegations is that based on a secret

information received to the effect that a youngster had been travelling along with MDMA in an A.C bus coming from Bangalore, when search was conducted, it was found that a youngster was carrying 2 bags, in front of Dhana Boutique on the eastern side of Plakkottu Castle building, on the opposite side of Kottarakkara private bus stand. On seeing the excise party, the petitioner attempted to escape. Thereafter, he was intercepted and, on search, 106 gram of MDMA was seized from his possession. Accordingly, crime was registered alleging commission of the above offence. Later, investigation revealed that the 1 st accused along with the petitioner herein purchased MDMA from Bangalore on 26.01.2023 along with Vishnu and Anand and they used to share the profit out of the said business. Further investigation revealed that the 2nd and 3rd accused entrusted Rs.90,000/- to the 1 st accused

for the purchase of contraband. Further when search was conducted, an yellow plastic cover, 3 ball shaped packets to store MDMA tied with masking tape, were seized from the petitioner’s custody.

4. Whereas, the learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail

application. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the statement given by the 1st accused and also from the materials collected during investigation it has been revealed that the 1 st accused purchased MDMA by using the money given by the 2 nd and 3rd accused; the 1st accused was arrested while carrying the contraband, jointly purchased by the 2nd and 3rd accused when he was transporting the same and the details of call records between the petitioner and the other accused during the relevant period, to substantiate the involvement of the petitioner in this crime.

5. This Court dismissed the first bail application

considering the fact that on perusal of the case diary, it was revealed that initially contraband to the tune of 106 gram of MDMA was seized from the possession of the 1 st accused and later investigation revealed that the 1st accused purchased MDMA by using the money handed over by the 2nd and 3rd accused and there are consistent calls in between the 1st accused, 2nd accused and 3rd accused during the relevant period. Further, investigation in this crime was at the very initial stage and details were to be obtained

by the Investigating Officer. Further in cases involving commercial quantity of contraband this Court cannot grant regular bail to the petitioner without satisfying the conditions as provided under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

6. In this second application for regular bail, nothing

substantiated to take a different view, since the earlier bail application was dismissed holding that the rider under Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot be diluted.

Therefore, this bail application stands dismissed. Sd/- (A. BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE) rtr/ APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 2749/2023 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure-A A TRUE COPY OF THE REMAND APPLICATION IN CRIME NO. 273/2023 OF KOTTARAKARA POLICE STATION. Annexure-B A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.02.2023 IN CRL.M.C. NO. 328 / 2023 OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM. Annexure-C A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.03.2023 IN B.A. NO. 1706 / 2023.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial