Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sudheer Kumar vs Sarmila

Sudheer Kumar vs Sarmila

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 17, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1350527

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/348/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sudheer Kumar

Respondent

Sarmila

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice t.r.ravi thursday, the 17th day of august 2023 / 26th sravana, rsa no. 348 of 2019 against the order/judgment in os 743/2014 of additional munsiff court ,kozhikode-i as 123/2016 of additional district court kozhikode-iii appellant/appellant/defendant no:2:- sudheer kumar s/o. late aramkuni devadasan, aged 56 years, strings, manatteparamba , near malabar christian college, kalathikunnu, amsom, desom kozhikode-pin-673 001 m.vivek rabindranath sri.v.t.madhavanunni respondents/respondents/plaintiffs: 1 sarmila d/o. late aramkuni devadasan, aged 52 , w/o. jayadevan, souparnika, chevayoor, amsom desom, malapparamba p.o, kozhikode-673 009 2 smitha d/o. late aramkuni devadasan, aged 46 years, w/o. manoj, a-11, nakshatra house, p.v.s. apartments, kalathikunnu amsom, kozhikode-673 respondent/respondent/defendant no:1 3 sudha, d/o. late aramkuni devadasan, aged 54 years, w/o. prakasan pilassery, pilassery house, vengary amsom desom, vengery p.o, kozhikode- sri.v.v.surendran sri.p.a.harish rsa no. 348 of 2019 2 this regular second appeal having come up for admission on 17.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa no. 348 of 2019 3t.r.ravi, j.---------------------------------------- rsa no.348 of 2019 ------------------------------------------- dated this the 17th day of august, 2023judgmentthe counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn, since the parties have settled their disputes. the second appeal is hence dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- t.r.ravi judge mus

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 26TH SRAVANA, RSA NO. 348 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 743/2014 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT ,KOZHIKODE-I AS 123/2016 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT KOZHIKODE-III APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT NO:2:- SUDHEER KUMAR S/O. LATE ARAMKUNI DEVADASAN, AGED 56 YEARS, STRINGS, MANATTEPARAMBA , NEAR MALABAR CHRISTIAN COLLEGE, KALATHIKUNNU, AMSOM, DESOM KOZHIKODE-PIN-673 001 M.VIVEK RABINDRANATH SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS: 1 SARMILA D/O. LATE ARAMKUNI DEVADASAN, AGED 52 , W/O. JAYADEVAN, SOUPARNIKA, CHEVAYOOR, AMSOM DESOM, MALAPPARAMBA P.O, KOZHIKODE-673 009 2 SMITHA D/O. LATE ARAMKUNI DEVADASAN, AGED 46 YEARS, W/O. MANOJ, A-11, NAKSHATRA HOUSE, P.V.S. APARTMENTS, KALATHIKUNNU AMSOM, KOZHIKODE-673 RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT NO:1 3 SUDHA, D/O. LATE ARAMKUNI DEVADASAN, AGED 54 YEARS, W/O. PRAKASAN PILASSERY, PILASSERY HOUSE, VENGARY AMSOM DESOM, VENGERY P.O, KOZHIKODE- SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH RSA NO. 348 OF 2019 2 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA NO. 348 OF 2019 3

T.R.RAVI, J.

---------------------------------------- RSA No.348 of 2019 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17TH day of August, 2023

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn, since the parties have settled their disputes. The second appeal is hence dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- T.R.RAVI JUDGE mus

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial