Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Manager vs Ambili S.

The Manager vs Ambili S.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 31, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1349369

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/397/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Manager

Respondent

Ambili S.

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan friday, the 31st day of march 2023 / 10th chaithra, 1945 rp no. 397 of 2023 against the order/judgmentwp(c) 25580/2018 of high court of kerala review petitioner/s: the manager, aged 76 years mahatma gandhi memorial high school, poozhanad, by advs. nisha george george poonthottam (sr.) a.l.navaneeth krishnan respondent/s:1 ambili s., aged 34 years w/o jayaprasad b.s., aged 34 years, high school assistant, physical science, mahatma gandhi memorial high school, poozhanad, 2 state of kerala, represented by the secretary, department of general education, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695001 3 the director of public instructions [now re-named as director of general education] jagathi, thycaud, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 4 the district educational officer, alummoodu, neyyattinkara, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695121 by adv r.k.muraleedharanother present: smt.surya binoy, sr.gp this review petition having come up for admission on 31.03.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: 2r.p.no.397 of 2023 inp.v.kunhikrishnan, j.====================================================== r.p.no.397 of 2023 in ============================================================= dated this the 31st day of march, 2023orderafter going through the memorandum of review petition, i am of the opinion that there is nothing to review in the order. this court only observed that, the appointment of the 1 st respondent can be approved as per ext.p10. it is clearly stated in the order that, the approval of appointment will be subject to the decision of this writ petition. there is no scope to review this order. therefore, this review petition is dismissed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan judge das

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1945 RP NO. 397 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 25580/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/S: THE MANAGER, AGED 76 YEARS MAHATMA GANDHI MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL, POOZHANAD, BY ADVS. NISHA GEORGE GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.) A.L.NAVANEETH KRISHNAN RESPONDENT/S:

1 AMBILI S., AGED 34 YEARS W/O JAYAPRASAD B.S., AGED 34 YEARS, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, PHYSICAL SCIENCE, MAHATMA GANDHI MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL, POOZHANAD, 2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 3 THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS [NOW RE-NAMED AS DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION] JAGATHI, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALUMMOODU, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695121 BY ADV R.K.MURALEEDHARAN

OTHER PRESENT: SMT.SURYA BINOY, SR.GP THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2R.P.No.397 of 2023 in

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

====================================================== R.P.No.397 of 2023 in ============================================================= Dated this the 31st day of March, 2023

ORDER

After going through the memorandum of review petition, I am of the opinion that there is nothing to review in the order. This Court only observed that, the appointment of the 1 st respondent can be approved as per Ext.P10. It is clearly stated in the order that, the approval of appointment will be subject to the decision of this writ petition. There is no scope to review this order. Therefore, this review petition is dismissed. sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial