Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.Sudakaran vs Peeru Mohammed

S.Sudakaran vs Peeru Mohammed

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 19, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1349217

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
FAO/228/2005

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Sudakaran

Respondent

Peeru Mohammed

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice basant balaji tuesday, the 19th day of september 2023 / 28th bhadra, 1945 fao no. 228 of 2005judgment as 254/1998 of ii additional district court,thiruvananthapuram os 1407/1992 of ii additional sub court,thiruvananthapuram appellants/respondents 4 to 6 in as/plaintiffs: 1 s.sudakaran, residing at santha bhavan, hadhapally,keezhthennakkal, village (wrongly shown as s.sasidharan). 2 smt.s.meenakumari residing at- do. do. 3 smt.p.anithakumari residing at do. do. by adv sri.vpk.panicker respondents/appellants and respondents 1 to 3 & 7 in as/plaintiff & defendants 1,2 & additional defendants 7 & 8:1 peeru mohammed, s/o.sulthan pillai, residing at t.c.29/327, thycaud village, thiruvananthapuram. 2 asha d/o.leela bai, ambadi, sai nagar, pappanamcode, nemom village, thiruvananthapuram. 3 smt.chitra d/o.premavally residing at aradhana, idavilakam muri, vailoor village. 4 smt.k.ananda vally residing atananda bhavan, mandakkal muri, vailoor village,, murukkumpuzha.5 smt.p.lali residing at lakshmi nivas, vazhamuttam pachalloor, thiruvallam, village, thiruvananthapuram. 6 smt.pathumma nazeema beevi, ajumal hardwares, nedumangad. by advs.sri.m.r.anandakuttan -r3 sri.r.s.kalkura -r1 sri.mahesh anandakuttan - r3 sri.b.sathiq/smt.shirmila. c.s -r3. this first appeal from orders having come up for admission on 19.09.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgment(dated this the 19th day of september 2023) the learned counsel for the appellants prayed that the appellants do not wish to continue the appeal and that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- basant balaji, judge dl/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 28TH BHADRA, 1945 FAO NO. 228 OF 2005

JUDGMENT AS 254/1998 OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT,

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM OS 1407/1992 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 IN AS/PLAINTIFFS: 1 S.SUDAKARAN, RESIDING AT SANTHA BHAVAN, HADHAPALLY,KEEZHTHENNAKKAL, VILLAGE (WRONGLY SHOWN AS S.SASIDHARAN). 2 SMT.S.MEENAKUMARI RESIDING AT- DO. DO. 3 SMT.P.ANITHAKUMARI RESIDING AT DO. DO. BY ADV SRI.VPK.PANICKER RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 & 7 IN AS/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS 1,2 & ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS 7 & 8:

1 PEERU MOHAMMED, S/O.SULTHAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT T.C.29/327, THYCAUD VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2 ASHA D/O.LEELA BAI, AMBADI, SAI NAGAR, PAPPANAMCODE, NEMOM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3 SMT.CHITRA D/O.PREMAVALLY RESIDING AT ARADHANA, IDAVILAKAM MURI, VAILOOR VILLAGE. 4 SMT.K.ANANDA VALLY RESIDING ATANANDA BHAVAN, MANDAKKAL MURI, VAILOOR VILLAGE,, MURUKKUMPUZHA.

5 SMT.P.LALI RESIDING AT LAKSHMI NIVAS, VAZHAMUTTAM PACHALLOOR, THIRUVALLAM, VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6 SMT.PATHUMMA NAZEEMA BEEVI, AJUMAL HARDWARES, NEDUMANGAD. BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.ANANDAKUTTAN -R3 SRI.R.S.KALKURA -R1 SRI.MAHESH ANANDAKUTTAN - R3 SRI.B.SATHIQ/SMT.SHIRMILA. C.S -R3. THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 19th day of September 2023) The learned counsel for the appellants prayed that the appellants do not wish to continue the appeal and that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. SD/- BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE dl/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial