Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abidha vs Satheesan

Abidha vs Satheesan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 30, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1348963

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
FAO/29/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abidha

Respondent

Satheesan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan thursday, the 30th day of march 2023 / 9th chaithra, 1945 against the order dated 21st day of january 2023 in i.a.no.4210/2018 in pauper o.p 228/2018 of ivth additional district court, thrissur appellant/petitioner: abidha, aged 60 years, w/o ramjad mansil khalid, pallipuram desom, valappad village, chavakkad taluk, p.o.pallipuram, pin - 680 567 by advs. p.m.abdul jaleel t.v.shaji k.shameer mohammed k.n.muhammed thanveer respondents/respondents: 1 satheesan, aged 43 years, s/o kaimparambil kuttan, keezhithani desom, karalam village and p.o. mukundapuram taluk, pin - 680 711 2 district collector thrissur, civil station, ayyanthole,thrissur district - 680 003 this first appeal from orders having come up for admission on 30.03.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe appeal is not pressed into service. the learned counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal. without prejudice to the right of parties to agitate the issue in accordance with the lex fori and lex loci, the appeal will stand allowed to be withdrawn as there is a defect in the format of the appeal. sd/- p.somarajan judge rkr-30/03/2023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2023 IN I.A.NO.4210/2018 IN PAUPER O.P 228/2018 OF IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ABIDHA, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O RAMJAD MANSIL KHALID, PALLIPURAM DESOM, VALAPPAD VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, P.O.PALLIPURAM, PIN - 680 567 BY ADVS. P.M.ABDUL JALEEL T.V.SHAJI K.SHAMEER MOHAMMED K.N.MUHAMMED THANVEER RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 SATHEESAN, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O KAIMPARAMBIL KUTTAN, KEEZHITHANI DESOM, KARALAM VILLAGE AND P.O. MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, PIN - 680 711 2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR THRISSUR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE,THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 003 THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The appeal is not pressed into service. The learned counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal. Without prejudice to the right of parties to agitate the issue in accordance with the lex fori and lex loci, the appeal will stand allowed to be withdrawn as there is a defect in the format of the appeal. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE rkr-30/03/2023

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial