Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Francis George vs Joseph

Francis George vs Joseph

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 30, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1348918

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/446/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Francis George

Respondent

Joseph

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice t.r.ravi friday, the 30th day of june 2023 / 9th ashadha, 1945 rsa no. 446 of 2021 against the judgment in as 35/2015 of additional district court-iv, kottayam os 1/2014 of munsiff court, changanacherry appellants/appellants/defendant nos. 1 & 2: 1 francis george aged 72 years, s/o. george, 2 aleyamma francis aged 71 years 3 tito francis aged 41 years chirathalakkal hose, kurumbanadom p.o., madappally village, changanacherry taluk, kottayam pin-686 536 by advs. ajith viswanathan shibu joseph r.anupama sayed mansoor bafakhy thangal respondent/respondent/plaintiff: joseph aged 64 years lakaparambil house, mammoodu p.o., madappally village, changanacherry taluk, kottayam. pin-686 536 by adv liji.j.vadakedom this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 30.06.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: r.s.a. no.446/2021 :2:t.r. ravi, j.------------------------------------------------------- r.s.a. no. 446 of 2021 --------------------------------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of june, 2023.judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and therefore, this appeal is not pressed. a memo dated 31.05..2023 to that effect has also been filed. accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- t.r. ravi, judge. rv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1945 RSA NO. 446 OF 2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 35/2015 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-IV, KOTTAYAM OS 1/2014 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHANGANACHERRY APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANT NOS. 1 & 2: 1 FRANCIS GEORGE AGED 72 YEARS, S/O. GEORGE, 2 ALEYAMMA FRANCIS AGED 71 YEARS 3 TITO FRANCIS AGED 41 YEARS CHIRATHALAKKAL HOSE, KURUMBANADOM P.O., MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM PIN-686 536 BY ADVS. AJITH VISWANATHAN SHIBU JOSEPH R.ANUPAMA SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: JOSEPH AGED 64 YEARS LAKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MAMMOODU P.O., MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM. PIN-686 536 BY ADV LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.S.A. No.446/2021 :2:

T.R. RAVI, J.

------------------------------------------------------- R.S.A. No. 446 of 2021 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2023.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and therefore, this appeal is not pressed. A memo dated 31.05..2023 to that effect has also been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- T.R. RAVI, JUDGE. Rv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial