Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C.K.Surendran vs Kunhimoosa

C.K.Surendran vs Kunhimoosa

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 05, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1348671

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
FAO/28/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.K.Surendran

Respondent

Kunhimoosa

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan wednesday, the 5th day of april 2023 / 15th chaithra, 1945 against the order dated 04.03.2023 in ia.6/2022 in os 61/2021 of sub court, vadakara appellant/petitioner in i.a/plaintiff in o.s: c.k.surendran, aged 63 years, s/o. achuthan, "cheruvath". chorode post, vatakara taluk, kozhikode, proprietor, rocky enclave, chorode, vatakara, kozhikode - 673106 by advs. b.krishnan r.parthasarathy respondent/respondent in i.a/defendant in os:kunhimoosa, s/o. kunhi mammu, aged 63 years, director, m/s. savoury restaurant, no.27, mosque road, frazer town, bangalore - 560 006, karnataka, permanent address 'manikoth house', aniyaram, post chokli, kannur- 670672 by adv g.sreekumar (chelur) this first appeal from orders having come up for hearing on 05.04.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentduring the course of argument, the learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that he is not pressing the appeal, without prejudice to the right of exhausting other remedies available to the party concerned. hence, permission is granted. the appeal will stand dismissed as not pressed, without prejudice to the right of parties to take up any of the measures available to them so as to protect their interest over the property or the rights, if any. sd/- p.somarajan judge msp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04.03.2023 IN IA.6/2022 IN OS 61/2021 OF SUB COURT, VADAKARA APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN I.A/PLAINTIFF IN O.S: C.K.SURENDRAN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O. ACHUTHAN, "CHERUVATH". CHORODE POST, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE, PROPRIETOR, ROCKY ENCLAVE, CHORODE, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE - 673106 BY ADVS. B.KRISHNAN R.PARTHASARATHY RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN I.A/DEFENDANT IN OS:

KUNHIMOOSA, S/O. KUNHI MAMMU, AGED 63 YEARS, DIRECTOR, M/S. SAVOURY RESTAURANT, NO.27, MOSQUE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 006, KARNATAKA, PERMANENT ADDRESS 'MANIKOTH HOUSE', ANIYARAM, POST CHOKLI, KANNUR- 670672 BY ADV G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 05.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

During the course of argument, the learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that he is not pressing the appeal, without prejudice to the right of exhausting other remedies available to the party concerned. Hence, permission is granted. The appeal will stand dismissed as not pressed, without prejudice to the right of parties to take up any of the measures available to them so as to protect their interest over the property or the rights, if any. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial