Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Subash K.a vs State of Kerala

Subash K.a vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 31, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1348064

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./2391/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subash K.a

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. the applicants are the accused nos.2 and 3 in crime no.154/2023 of adimaly police station. the offences alleged are punishable under sections 498a and 506 of ipc.3. the prosecution case, in short, is that the de factocomplainant was subjected to cruelty both physically and mentally by the applicants and the accused no.1 demanding more dowry and thereby committed the above said offences.4. i have heard sri.latheesh sebastian, the learned counsel for the applicants and sri.m.p.prasanth, the learned public prosecutor. perused the case diary.5. the learned counsel for the applicants submitted that theapplicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. the counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to get bail. the learned public prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminalacts of the applicants, and if they are released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.6. the applicants are the in-laws of the de facto complainant.the crime was registered pursuant to a private complaint filed by the de facto complainant before the judicial first class magistrate court, adimaly. there are no specific allegations against the applicants. considering the allegations levelled against the applicants, their custodial interrogation does not appear to be necessary. for these reasons, it is a fit case where pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicants.in the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-(i) the applicants shall be released on bail in the event of theirarrest on executing a bond for rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.(ii) the applicants shall fully cooperate with.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1945 CRIME NO.154/2023 OF ADIMALY POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 & 3: 1 SUBASH K.A AGED 66 YEARS S/O LATE KUTTAN, KAVALAYIL HOUSE, 2 SHYLAJA SUBASH AGED 57 YEARS W/O SUBASH K.A., KAVALAYIL HOUSE, BY ADV LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT/STATE/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 OTHER PRESENT: SRI.M.P.PRASANTH. P.P THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This application is filed u/s 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos.2 and 3 in Crime No.154/2023 of Adimaly Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 498A and 506 of IPC.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the de facto

complainant was subjected to cruelty both physically and mentally by the applicants and the accused No.1 demanding more dowry and thereby committed the above said offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Latheesh Sebastian, The learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.M.P.Prasanth, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the

applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal

acts of the applicants, and if they are released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The applicants are the in-laws of the de facto complainant.

The crime was registered pursuant to a private complaint filed by the de facto complainant before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Adimaly. There are no specific allegations against the applicants. Considering the allegations levelled against the applicants, their custodial interrogation does not appear to be necessary. For these reasons, it is a fit case where pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicants.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail in the event of their

arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicants shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting themselves to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the

prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court. Sd/- DR.KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE AS

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial