Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Samuel Thomas vs Devasia P.S

Samuel Thomas vs Devasia P.S

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 02, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1348045

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
AR/47/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Samuel Thomas

Respondent

Devasia P.S

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice murali purushothaman friday, the 2nd day of june 2023 / 12th jyaishta, 1945 ar no. 47 of 2023 petitioners: 1 samuel thomas aged 51 years s/o parayil thomas samuel, kotturath house, chachipunna, punnala p.o, punnala village pathanapuram, kollam-, pin - 689696 2 cheriyachan varghese aged 59 years s/o varghese, mulamthanathu veedu, murukkuman, nilamel p.o, nilamel village, kottarakkara, kollam, pin - 691535 by advs. s.santhosh kumar baby sujatha respondent/s: devasia p.s aged 67 years paradayil mercy villa, chadayamangalam p.o valukunnu, chadayamangalam village, kottarakkara, kollam, pin - 691534 this arbitration request having come up for admission on 02.06.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: ar no. 47 of 2023 :2:judgmentit is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has been settled and the petitioner is not intending to prosecute the arbitration request. accordingly, the arbitration request is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- murali purushothaman judge sb

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 12TH JYAISHTA, 1945 AR NO. 47 OF 2023 PETITIONERS: 1 SAMUEL THOMAS AGED 51 YEARS S/O PARAYIL THOMAS SAMUEL, KOTTURATH HOUSE, CHACHIPUNNA, PUNNALA P.O, PUNNALA VILLAGE PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM-, PIN - 689696 2 CHERIYACHAN VARGHESE AGED 59 YEARS S/O VARGHESE, MULAMTHANATHU VEEDU, MURUKKUMAN, NILAMEL P.O, NILAMEL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691535 BY ADVS. S.SANTHOSH KUMAR BABY SUJATHA RESPONDENT/S: DEVASIA P.S AGED 67 YEARS PARADAYIL MERCY VILLA, CHADAYAMANGALAM P.O VALUKUNNU, CHADAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691534 THIS ARBITRATION REQUEST HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AR NO. 47 OF 2023 :2:

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has been settled and the petitioner is not intending to prosecute the Arbitration Request. Accordingly, the Arbitration Request is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SB

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial