Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Joseph Tomy, vs the State of Kerala ,

Joseph Tomy, vs The State of Kerala ,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1347812

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/9555/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Joseph Tomy,

Respondent

The State of Kerala ,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran saturday, the 30th day of september 2023 / 8th aswina, 1945 wp(c) no. 9555 of 2023 petitioners: 1 joseph tomy, aged 79 years, son of joseph, residing at 2 elamma, aged 67 years, wife of joseph tomy, residing at 3 jose tom, aged 45 years son of joseph tomy, residing at 4 tom k. tom, aged 40 years, son of joseph tomy, residing at panamattathil njavallil kadankavil house, karoor p.o., ponadu kara, lalam village, meenachil taluk, kottayam district, pin - 686575 by advs. abraham george jacob c.muralikrishnan (payyanur) p.i.raheena respondents: 1 the state of kerala , represented by the secretary to the government of kerala in the department of excise, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695001 2 the district collector, kottayam, collectorate p.o. kottayam, pin - 686002 3 the excise commissioner, excise commissionerate, vikas bhavan, nandavanam, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695033 4 the tahsildar (revenue recovery), meenachil taluk, pala p.o., kottayam district, pin - 686575 5 the village officer, lalam village, mini civil station, pala p.o., kottayam district, pin - 686575 this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.09.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition and says that a memo has also been filed on record. consequently, this writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn; with liberty being reserved to the petitioner to approach this court again, if so required, in future. sd/- rr devan ramachandran judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SATURDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 8TH ASWINA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 9555 OF 2023 PETITIONERS: 1 JOSEPH TOMY, AGED 79 YEARS, SON OF JOSEPH, RESIDING AT 2 ELAMMA, AGED 67 YEARS, WIFE OF JOSEPH TOMY, RESIDING AT 3 JOSE TOM, AGED 45 YEARS SON OF JOSEPH TOMY, RESIDING AT 4 TOM K. TOM, AGED 40 YEARS, SON OF JOSEPH TOMY, RESIDING AT PANAMATTATHIL NJAVALLIL KADANKAVIL HOUSE, KAROOR P.O., PONADU KARA, LALAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686575 BY ADVS. ABRAHAM GEORGE JACOB C.MURALIKRISHNAN (PAYYANUR) P.I.RAHEENA RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA , REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM, COLLECTORATE P.O. KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686002 3 THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, VIKAS BHAVAN, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 4 THE TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), MEENACHIL TALUK, PALA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686575 5 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, LALAM VILLAGE, MINI CIVIL STATION, PALA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686575 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition and says that a Memo has also been filed on record. Consequently, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn; with liberty being reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court again, if so required, in future. Sd/- RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial