Full Judgment
2. The Ld. Counsel submits that this issue has been gone into in detail by a Large Bench as in the case of Dai Itchi Karkaria v. CCE reported in 1996(63) ECR 23 wherein, it has been held that duty paid on inputs which are captively consumed are not required to be added in the assessable value. Ld. Counsel submits that this decision has been noted by this Bench in the case of CCE v. Vemy Containers Ltd. as per Order No. 39/97 Dated 13.12.96. He submits that this issue having been decided in the appellants favour, therefore, this appeal can also be allowed.
4. On a careful consideration of the submissions of both the sides, we notice that the issue is in favour of the appellant as per the above cited judgment. They are entitled to avail the deduction on the duty paid on CVD/CED on the granules. Therefore, the Department was not justified in recovering the amount of Rs. 9,77,934/- and imposing penalty of Rs. 75,000/-.
5. In that view of the matter, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief.