Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kuttan vs Ramankutty

Kuttan vs Ramankutty

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 23, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1344581

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/440/2005

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kuttan

Respondent

Ramankutty

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan tuesday, the 23rd day of may 2023 / 2nd jyaishta, 1945 against the order in i.a.no.3848/2003 dated 09.02.2005 in o.s.no.101/2000 of principal sub court, irinjalakudarevision petitioner/petitioner: kuttan, s/o kozhiparambil adimakunji, kaipamangalam village and desom, kodungallur taluk. by advs. sri.m.shaju purushothaman sri.k.r.rajesh respondent/respondent: ramankutty s/o. chunkampurakkal kunjikuttan, vadanappilly amsom desom, chavakkad taluk. this civil revision petition having come up for admission on 23.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:o r d e rthe petitioner and the counsel remained absent. nobody even represented the matter. c.r.p is of the year 2005. so far no steps were taken as against the first respondent. earlier the notice issued was returned with an endorsement ‘not known’. as such, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. the c.r.p will stand dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge rkr-23/05/23

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2023 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.3848/2003 DATED 09.02.2005 IN O.S.NO.101/2000 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA

REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONER: KUTTAN, S/O KOZHIPARAMBIL ADIMAKUNJI, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE AND DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.R.RAJESH RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: RAMANKUTTY S/O. CHUNKAMPURAKKAL KUNJIKUTTAN, VADANAPPILLY AMSOM DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

The petitioner and the counsel remained absent. Nobody even represented the matter. C.R.P is of the year 2005. So far no steps were taken as against the first respondent. Earlier the notice issued was returned with an endorsement ‘not known’. As such, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. The C.R.P will stand dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE rkr-23/05/23

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial