Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abraham vs Mamman

Abraham vs Mamman

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 30, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1344335

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/1339/2004

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abraham

Respondent

Mamman

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan tuesday, the 30th day of may 2023 / 9th jyaishta, 1945 against the order/judgment in cma 15/2000 of sub court, muvattupuzha against the order in ia.119/98 in os 172/1998 of munsiff court, kolencherrryrevision petitioner(appellant/respondent: abraham, s/o varghese, cheruthottil house, thammanimattom kara, aikkaranadu south village, kunnathunadu taluk. by advs. sri.dinesh r.shenoy sri.jojo george respondent(respondent/petitioner): mamman, s/o ouseph, chakkummoottil house, thammanimattom kara, aikkaranadu south village, kunnathunadu taluk. by adv sri.k.k.chandran pillai this civil revision petition having come up for admission on 30.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:o r d e rthe learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the matter has become infructuous. hence, the crp will stand dismissed as infructuous. sd/- p.somarajan judge msp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMA 15/2000 OF SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA.119/98 IN OS 172/1998 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KOLENCHERRRY

REVISION PETITIONER(APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: ABRAHAM, S/O VARGHESE, CHERUTHOTTIL HOUSE, THAMMANIMATTOM KARA, AIKKARANADU SOUTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.JOJO GEORGE RESPONDENT(RESPONDENT/PETITIONER): MAMMAN, S/O OUSEPH, CHAKKUMMOOTTIL HOUSE, THAMMANIMATTOM KARA, AIKKARANADU SOUTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADV SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the CRP will stand dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial