Deepak vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 05, 2023

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1343208

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1343208
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath
Decided On: Apr 05, 2023
Case Number: Bail Appl./1938/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.6. the applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 12.4.2020.a perusal of the case diary would reveal that the accusation against the applicant is very serious, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. the offences alleged against the applicant are grave and serious in nature. he has murdered his own wife. the applicant is not a native of kerala. in these circumstances, the learned public prosecutor strongly opposed the application.7. i have called for a report from the learned sessions judge,who reported that the case has already been scheduled for trial from 24.5.2023 to 2.6.2023 and it can be disposed within four months. taking into account the grievous nature of the crime and also the fact that the applicant is a native of calcutta, i am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. the court below is directed to dispose of the case as stated in the report.8. the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that unless ba no. 1938/2023 4the applicant is released on bail, he will not be in a position to instruct his counsel during trial. the court below is directed to give sufficient opportunity to the applicant to meet his counsel either at the jail or at the court premises before and during trial. the bail application is accordingly dismissed. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge ab

Full Judgment

BA NO. 1938/2023 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 1938 OF 2023 CRIME NO.1007/2020 OF Kundara Police Station, Kollam PETITIONER/ACCUSED: DEEPAK AGED 35 YEARS S/O.SWADEEP, KAVITHA BHAVAN, PERINADU VILLAGE, CHERUMOODU CHERRY, KOLLAM, PIN - 691601 BY ADV ARUN BABU RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 INSPECTOR OF POLICE KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM , PIN - 691501 BY SRI.MAYA.N -PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BA NO. 1938/2023 2

ORDER

This is application for regular bail filed by the accused in S.C.No.1271/2020 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court IV, Kollam (for short 'the court below').

2. The offences alleged against the applicant are punishable under Sections 324 and 302 of IPC.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 11.4.2020 at about 10 pm, the applicant committed murder of his wife and thereby committed the offence.

4. I have heard Sri.Arun Babu, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt.Maya.N, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the

applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On BA NO. 1938/2023 3 the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 12.4.2020.

A perusal of the case diary would reveal that the accusation against the applicant is very serious, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. The offences alleged against the applicant are grave and serious in nature. He has murdered his own wife. The applicant is not a native of Kerala. In these circumstances, the learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the application.

7. I have called for a report from the learned Sessions Judge,

who reported that the case has already been scheduled for trial from 24.5.2023 to 2.6.2023 and it can be disposed within four months. Taking into account the grievous nature of the crime and also the fact that the applicant is a native of Calcutta, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. The court below is directed to dispose of the case as stated in the report.

8. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that unless BA NO. 1938/2023 4

the applicant is released on bail, he will not be in a position to instruct his counsel during trial. The court below is directed to give sufficient opportunity to the applicant to meet his counsel either at the jail or at the court premises before and during trial. The bail application is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE ab

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2023 Same Parties Deepak vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath