Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Omana George vs George

Omana George vs George

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 17, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1342635

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/2140/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Omana George

Respondent

George

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan thursday, the 17th day of august 2023 / 26th sravana, 1945 crl.mc no. 2140 of 2015 against the order/judgmentmc 2/2015 of chief judl.magistrate, ernakulam petitioner: omana george, aged 59 years d/o joseph, chakkanattu house, sewage road, elamkulam, ernakulam. by adv sri.dilish john respondents: 1 george, aged 60 years s/o vakko, theruviparambil house, puthukkalavattom, elamakkara, ernakulam, pin:682017. 2 rijo joseph, aged 33 years s/o joseph, chakkanattu house, sewage road, elamkulam, pin:682019. 3 state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682031. by advs. sri.a.t.anilkumar adv.maya m n, pp this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 17.08.2023, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.m.c.2140/2015 2p. v. kunhikrishnan, j.crl.m.c.no.2140 of 2015 dated this the 17th day of august, 2023orderthe above criminal miscellaneous case is filed with the following prayers:(i) to stay the further proceedings of mc(ii) issue such other order as direction as this honourable court may deem fit and proper as to the circumstances of the case.2. the petitioner herein is the petitioner before the lowercourt. this crl.m.c is filed for getting some more time to produce certain documents. this crl.m.c is pending before this court from 2015 onwards. even though this court stayed the proceedings of the lower court for a period of two weeks, the interim order was vacated by this court on 09.04.2015. now as per the e-court website, it is seen that the case is dismissed for default. if that is the case, the crl.m.c.2140/2015 3 prayers in this crl.m.c might have been infructuous. therefore, this crl.m.c is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- p. v. kunhikrishnan judge sbna/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 26TH SRAVANA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 2140 OF 2015 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTMC 2/2015 OF CHIEF JUDL.MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER: OMANA GEORGE, AGED 59 YEARS D/O JOSEPH, CHAKKANATTU HOUSE, SEWAGE ROAD, ELAMKULAM, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV SRI.DILISH JOHN RESPONDENTS: 1 GEORGE, AGED 60 YEARS S/O VAKKO, THERUVIPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHUKKALAVATTOM, ELAMAKKARA, ERNAKULAM, PIN:682017. 2 RIJO JOSEPH, AGED 33 YEARS S/O JOSEPH, CHAKKANATTU HOUSE, SEWAGE ROAD, ELAMKULAM, PIN:682019. 3 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. BY ADVS. SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR ADV.MAYA M N, PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C.2140/2015 2

P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

Crl.M.C.No.2140 of 2015 Dated this the 17th day of August, 2023

ORDER

The above criminal miscellaneous case is filed with the following prayers:

(i) To stay the further proceedings of MC

(ii) Issue such other order as direction as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper as to the circumstances of the case.

2. The petitioner herein is the petitioner before the lower

court. This Crl.M.C is filed for getting some more time to produce certain documents. This Crl.M.C is pending before this Court from 2015 onwards. Even though this Court stayed the proceedings of the lower court for a period of two weeks, the interim order was vacated by this Court on 09.04.2015. Now as per the e-court website, it is seen that the case is dismissed for default. If that is the case, the Crl.M.C.2140/2015 3 prayers in this Crl.M.C might have been infructuous. Therefore, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE Sbna/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial