Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajan vs District Geologist

RAJAN vs District Geologist

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 01, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1342202

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/6689/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RAJAN

Respondent

District Geologist

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman wednesday, the 1st day of march 2023 / 10th phalguna, 1944 petitioner: rajan aged 67 years s/o.baby, aanjinadu veedu, adoor p.o, by advs. r.sunil kumar a.salini lal arun krishna nikitha suresh respondent: district geologist department of mining and geology adoor, sri.appu.p.s-gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 01.03.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 1st day of march, 2023 this writ petition is filed seeking directions to the respondent to consider ext.p1 application made for transit passes for removal of ordinary earth from the property of the petitioner. the petitioner submits that building permit as required has been obtained and that the application is, therefore, liable to be considered in accordance with law.2. having heard the learned government pleader also, there will be adirection to the respondent to take up ext.p1 application submitted by the petitioner and to consider and pass orders on the same after considering all relevant aspects of the matter and after conducting due site inspections and after perusing the relevant documents to be produced by the petitioner. appropriate orders shall be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. this writ petition is ordered accordingly. sd/- anu sivaraman judge np appendix of wp(c) 6689/2023 petitioner’s exhibits exhibit p1 copy of the application filed before the respondent dated 15/2/23 respondent’s exhibits: nil

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1944 PETITIONER: RAJAN AGED 67 YEARS S/O.BABY, AANJINADU VEEDU, ADOOR P.O, BY ADVS. R.SUNIL KUMAR A.SALINI LAL ARUN KRISHNA NIKITHA SURESH RESPONDENT: DISTRICT GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY ADOOR, SRI.APPU.P.S-GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of March, 2023 This writ petition is filed seeking directions to the respondent to consider Ext.P1 application made for transit passes for removal of ordinary earth from the property of the petitioner. The petitioner submits that building permit as required has been obtained and that the application is, therefore, liable to be considered in accordance with law.

2. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, there will be a

direction to the respondent to take up Ext.P1 application submitted by the petitioner and to consider and pass orders on the same after considering all relevant aspects of the matter and after conducting due site inspections and after perusing the relevant documents to be produced by the petitioner. Appropriate orders shall be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE NP APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6689/2023 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 15/2/23 RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS: NIL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial