Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.T. Panose vs State

P.T. Panose vs STATE

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 02, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1340909

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/444/2001

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.T. Panose

Respondent

STATE

Excerpt

.....government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram district, pin-695 001. 2 the district collector, kannur, office of the district collector, civil station, kannur district, pin-670 101. 3 the taluk land board, thalassery, office of the revenue divisional officer, thalassery, kannur district, pin-670 101, represented by its chairman. w.p/(c) no.6660 of 2016 3 4 the tahasildar thalassery, office of the tahasildar, thalassery taluk, kannur district, pin-670 101.5 village officer, vekkalam village, nedumpoil p.o, thalassery taluk, kannur district, pin-670 680. by government pleader sri. s.unnikrishnan this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 02.06.2023, along with crp.444/2001, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p/(c) no.6660 of 2016 4 order/judgment it is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioners that there is no instruction from the party concerned. as such, this court has no other option, but to dismiss the cases for non prosecution. hence, both the cases will stand dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge dmr/- w.p/(c) no.6660 of 2016 5 appendix of wp(c) 6660/2016 petitioners' exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the order dated 6-6-2000 passed by the 3rd respondent in sm/93/76/tly exhibit p2 true copy of the will deed no.102 of 2005 of sro peravoor. exhibit p3 true copy of the representation dated 12-2- 2016 submitted by the 1st petitioner before the 3rd respondent. // true copy // p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 12TH JYAISHTA, 1945 CRP NO. 444 OF 2001 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 6.6.2000 IN CC No. SM 93 /1976 OF TALUK LAND BOARD, THALASSERY

REVISION PETITIONER: P.T. PANOOSE, PANAMTHOTTAM HOUSE, MANATHANA AMSOM, PERAVOOR DESOM, POST THUNDIYIL, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SMT.SHAHNA KARTHIKEYAN SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM 2 TALUK LAND BOARD, TELLICHERRY 3 THASILDAR, THALASSERY 4 ARAYAMBATH KUNHIKRISHNAN NAIR, VEKKALAM AMSOM, DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK 5 KAROTH NANI AMMA, W/o ARAMBATH KUNHIKRISHNAN NAIR, VEKKALAM AMSOM, DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI S. UNNIKRISHNAN THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 02.06.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).6660/2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: W.P/(C) No.6660 of 2016 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 12TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 6660 OF 2016 PETITIONERS: 1 V.C.PAUL, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O CHERIYA, VADAKKUMPADAN HOUSE, PAVARATTI P.O., PAVARATTI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 507. 2 TESSA THOMAS, AGED 20 YEARS, S/o THOMAS, PANATHOTTATHIL HOUSE, THUNDIYIL P.O., VELLARVELLY AMSOM, THONDIYIL DESOM, IRITTY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 673. 3 STEPHEN THOMAS, AGED 19 YEARS, S/o THOMAS, PANATHOTTATHIL HOUSE, THUNDIYIL P.O., VELLARVELLY AMSOM, THONDIYIL DESOM, IRITTY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 673. BY ADVS. SRI.ABU MATHEW SRI.AJU MATHEW SRI.ABHILASH MATHOOR RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695 001. 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 101. 3 THE TALUK LAND BOARD, THALASSERY, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 101, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. W.P/(C) No.6660 of 2016 3 4 THE TAHASILDAR THALASSERY, OFFICE OF THE TAHASILDAR, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 101.

5 VILLAGE OFFICER, VEKKALAM VILLAGE, NEDUMPOIL P.O, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 680. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S.UNNIKRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.06.2023, ALONG WITH CRP.444/2001, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P/(C) No.6660 of 2016 4 ORDER/JUDGMENT It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioners that there is no instruction from the party concerned. As such, this court has no other option, but to dismiss the cases for non prosecution. Hence, both the cases will stand dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE DMR/- W.P/(C) No.6660 of 2016 5 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6660/2016 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6-6-2000 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN SM/93/76/TLY EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WILL DEED NO.102 OF 2005 OF SRO PERAVOOR. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12-2- 2016 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial