Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohanan G. vs the Geologist,

Mohanan G. vs The Geologist,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 27, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1340113

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/5634/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohanan G.

Respondent

The Geologist,

Excerpt

.....691306. 9 anilkumar, karyot puthenveetil, archal, 10 reshma, w/o anilkumar, karyot puthenveetil, 11 surendran, kanjiramvila veetil, archal, 12 vasanthi, w/o surendran,kanjiramvila veetil,nirmal v nair anees.t(k/983/2008) muhammed naseef bin salim(k/349/2021) della abraham(k/000841/2015) arathi prabhakaran(k/001158/2022) this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 27.02.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 27th day of february, 2023 the counsel for the petitioner submits that due to the interim order and the passage of time, the writ petition has become infructuous, and the petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- n. nagaresh judge ams appendix of wp(c) 5634/2023 petitioner's exhibits exhibit-p1 true copy of the site approval plan and building permit issued by the secretary, anchal grama panchayath dated 08.02.2021 exhibit-p2 true copy of the development permit issued by the secretary, anchal grama panchayath dated 08.02.2021 exhibit-p3 true copy of chalan for payment of money in the name of the first respondent in the treasury dated 24.03.2021 exhibit-p4 true copy of the order no. 1005/2021- 22/oe/doq/s2/452/2021 dated 31.03.2022 exhibit-p5 certified copy of the judgment dated 12.04.2022 in w.p.(c) no. 13830/2022 exhibit-p6 true copy of the communication no. 452/doq/s.2/2021 dated 09.02.2023 issued by the 1st respondent to the 3rd respondent exhibit-p7 true copy of the complaint made by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent exhibit-p8 true copy of the complaint made by the petitioner before the 4th respondent

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 8TH PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 5634 OF 2023 PETITIONER: MOHANAN G. AGED 68 YEARS CHAKKIYARA PUTHEN VEEDU, ARCHAL, NEDIYARA P.O., ANCHAL, KOLLAM, PIN - 691306. K.SUDHINKUMAR S.NITHIN (ANCHAL) RESPONDENTS: 1 THE GEOLOGIST, DISTRICT OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVANIKETHAN, ASRAMAM, KOLLAM - 691002.

2 VILLAGE OFFICER, ANCHAL VILLAGE, ANCHAL P.O., 3 DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF (RURAL) DISTRICT POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM - 691506. 4 CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE(SHO), ANCHAL POLICE STATION, 5 MADHUSOODANAN MAYABHAVAN, ARCHAL, NEDIYARA P.O., 6 LEELA, W/O MADHUSOODANAN, MAYABHAVAN, 7 MANEESH, S/O MADHUSOODANAN, MAYABHAVAN, 8 SARI, W/O MANEESH, MAYABHAVAN, ARCHAL, NEDIYARA P.O., KOLLAM- 691306. 9 ANILKUMAR, KARYOT PUTHENVEETIL, ARCHAL, 10 RESHMA, W/O ANILKUMAR, KARYOT PUTHENVEETIL, 11 SURENDRAN, KANJIRAMVILA VEETIL, ARCHAL, 12 VASANTHI, W/O SURENDRAN,KANJIRAMVILA VEETIL,

NIRMAL V NAIR ANEES.T(K/983/2008) MUHAMMED NASEEF BIN SALIM(K/349/2021) DELLA ABRAHAM(K/000841/2015) ARATHI PRABHAKARAN(K/001158/2022) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 27th day of February, 2023 The counsel for the petitioner submits that due to the interim order and the passage of time, the writ petition has become infructuous, and the petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE ams APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5634/2023 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SITE APPROVAL PLAN AND BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, ANCHAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 08.02.2021 Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, ANCHAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 08.02.2021 Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF CHALAN FOR PAYMENT OF MONEY IN THE NAME OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN THE TREASURY DATED 24.03.2021 Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. 1005/2021- 22/OE/DOQ/S2/452/2021 DATED 31.03.2022 Exhibit-P5 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.04.2022 IN W.P.(C) NO. 13830/2022 Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. 452/DOQ/S.2/2021 DATED 09.02.2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial