Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.Pramod vs Sandhya

K.Pramod vs Sandhya

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 30, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1339675

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/857/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Pramod

Respondent

Sandhya

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque & the honourable mrs. justice sophy thomas friday, the 30th day of june 2023 / 9th ashadha, 1945 con.case(c) no. 857 of 2014 against the judgment in w.p.(c) no.24064/2013 dated 27.09.2013 ------ petitioner: k.pramod, aged 40 years, s/o.k.chandrasekharan, kondath house, vadookara p.o., thrissur-680 007. by adv.sri.rajit respondents/respondents 2 & 3: 1 b.sandhya, age and father's name not known to the petitioner, working as transport commissioner, trans towers, vazhuthacaud, thiruvananthapuram-695001. 2 c.k.asokan, age and father's name not known to the petitioner, working as regional transport officer, thrissur-680001. by government pleader, smt.princy xavier this contempt of court case (civil) having been finally heard on 30.06.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: c.o.(c) no.857/2014 2judgmenta.muhamed mustaque, j.this contempt case is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to reopen, if necessary, by filing a memo within a period of two months from today. a.muhamed mustaque sophy thomas ln

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 857 OF 2014 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.24064/2013 DATED 27.09.2013 ------ PETITIONER: K.PRAMOD, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.K.CHANDRASEKHARAN, KONDATH HOUSE, VADOOKARA P.O., THRISSUR-680 007. BY ADV.SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 & 3: 1 B.SANDHYA, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, TRANS TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2 C.K.ASOKAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, THRISSUR-680001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.PRINCY XAVIER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.O.(C) No.857/2014 2

JUDGMENT

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

This Contempt Case is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to reopen, if necessary, by filing a memo within a period of two months from today. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE SOPHY THOMAS ln

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial