Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Aleyamma Mathunny vs Pradeep Kumar T.V

Aleyamma Mathunny vs Pradeep Kumar T.V

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 28, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1338994

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/371/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aleyamma Mathunny

Respondent

Pradeep Kumar T.V

Excerpt

.....on the same day delivered the following:p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.------------------------------ con.case(c)no. 371 of 2023 ---------------------------------------------- dated this the 28th day of february, 2023judgmentthis contempt case is filed alleging violation of the directions in the judgment dated 15.02.2022 in w.p.(c) no.22756/2020. today when the matter came up for consideration, the government pleader submitted that the inspection is already conducted and report is submitted to the panchayat on 16.02.2021. the counsel appearing for 1 st respondent submitted that necessary consequential steps based on the report of district medical officer is taken and a notice is also issued as e1-15430/22 dated 27.02.2023. the counsel appearing for the 1 st respondent also submitted that follow-up action will also be taken. if that is the case, contempt proceedings need not be retained. therefore the contempt proceedings is closed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan sm judge appendix of con.case(c) 371/2023 petitioner annexures annexure a1 the certified copy of judgment dated 12.7.2022 in w.p(c)no.22756/2020 annexure a2 the copy of representation dated 22.10.2022 submitted before the 1st respondent annexure a3 the copy of representation dated 22.10.2022 submitted before the 2nd respondent annexure a4 a copy of letter dated 23.11.2022 issued by the 1st respondent to the petitioner annexure a5 the copy of order in r.p no.77/2023 dated 24.1.2023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1944 CON.CASE(C) NO. 371 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 22756/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

PETITIONER/S: ALEYAMMA MATHUNNY AGED 57 YEARS W/O.ALEXANDER KOSHY, KUZHIYIL VEEDU, KIZHAKKETHERUVU P.O, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM,, PIN - 691531 BY ADVS. K.SIJU ANJANA KANNATH RESPONDENT/S: 1 PRADEEP KUMAR T.V SECRETARY, KOTTARAKKARA MUNICIPALITY, KOTTARAKKARA P.O, KOLLAM, PIN - 691506 2 JACOB VARGHESE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM, PIN - OTHER PRESENT: SMT. NISHA BOSE SR.GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

------------------------------ Con.Case(C)No. 371 Of 2023 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of February, 2023

JUDGMENT

This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the directions in the judgment dated 15.02.2022 in W.P.(C) No.22756/2020. Today when the matter came up for consideration, the Government pleader submitted that the inspection is already conducted and report is submitted to the Panchayat on 16.02.2021. The counsel appearing for 1 st respondent submitted that necessary consequential steps based on the report of District Medical Officer is taken and a notice is also issued as E1-15430/22 dated 27.02.2023. The counsel appearing for the 1 st respondent also submitted that follow-up action will also be taken. If that is the case, contempt proceedings need not be retained. Therefore the contempt proceedings is closed. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN SM JUDGE APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 371/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 12.7.2022 IN W.P(C)NO.22756/2020 Annexure A2 THE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 22.10.2022 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT Annexure A3 THE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 22.10.2022 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT Annexure A4 A COPY OF LETTER DATED 23.11.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Annexure A5 THE COPY OF ORDER IN R.P NO.77/2023 DATED 24.1.2023

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties Aleyamma Mathunny vs Pradeep Kumar T.V Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.V.Kunhikrishnan

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales