Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

O Thankachan vs Malay Chatterjee

O Thankachan vs Malay Chatterjee

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 25, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1338261

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/243/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

O Thankachan

Respondent

Malay Chatterjee

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh tuesday, the 25th day of july 2023 / 3rd sravana, 1945 con.case(c) no. 243 of 2013 against the order/judgment wpc 33752/2011 of high court of kerala petitioners:1 o thankachan aged 62 years s/o. late ummunni kozhy, residing at kavumkal puthen veedu, vavolikandom.p.o., kumpathamom, vadasserikkara, pathanamthitta district-689662. (personal no. 45197) 2 leelamma w/o. late a.k. johnkutty, anil bhavanam, kizhakketheruve, kottarakkara, kollam district-691542, now residing at crra house no.6, chalakuzhi road, pattam.p.o., thiruvananthapuram. (personal no. of late a.k. johnkutty-03714)sri.rinny stephen chamaparampil smt.asha elizabeth mathew respondents: 1 malay chatterjee chairman cum managing director, hindustan steel works construction ltd. kolkata, west benga-700022. 2 p.k. mishra regional provident fund commissioner, d.k. block, salt lake city, kolkatta, west bengal-700091. sri.t.sanjay, cgc sri.t.sanjay cgc smt.t.n.girija scepf organisation this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 25.07.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 25th day of july, 2023 counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents have taken a contention that the 2nd petitioner is not entitled to pension as the deceased had not joined family pension scheme. the petitioners seek leave to withdraw the contempt of court case with liberty to approach appropriate authorities or take appropriate proceedings for receiving the family pension. granting such liberty, the contempt of court case is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- n.nagaresh judge spk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 3RD SRAVANA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 243 OF 2013 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WPC 33752/2011 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS:

1 O THANKACHAN AGED 62 YEARS S/O. LATE UMMUNNI KOZHY, RESIDING AT KAVUMKAL PUTHEN VEEDU, VAVOLIKANDOM.P.O., KUMPATHAMOM, VADASSERIKKARA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689662. (PERSONAL NO. 45197) 2 LEELAMMA W/O. LATE A.K. JOHNKUTTY, ANIL BHAVANAM, KIZHAKKETHERUVE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691542, NOW RESIDING AT CRRA HOUSE NO.6, CHALAKUZHI ROAD, PATTAM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (PERSONAL NO. OF LATE A.K. JOHNKUTTY-03714)

SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL SMT.ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW RESPONDENTS: 1 MALAY CHATTERJEE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LTD. KOLKATA, WEST BENGA-700022. 2 P.K. MISHRA REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, D.K. BLOCK, SALT LAKE CITY, KOLKATTA, WEST BENGAL-700091. SRI.T.SANJAY, CGC SRI.T.SANJAY CGC SMT.T.N.GIRIJA SCEPF ORGANISATION THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of July, 2023 Counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents have taken a contention that the 2nd petitioner is not entitled to pension as the deceased had not joined Family Pension Scheme. The petitioners seek leave to withdraw the Contempt of Court Case with liberty to approach appropriate authorities or take appropriate proceedings for receiving the family pension. Granting such liberty, the Contempt of Court Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial